[theme-reviewers] Theme text domain and function name prefix
Srikanth Koneru
tskk79 at gmail.com
Sat Jul 27 16:51:35 UTC 2013
Yes, they all use same code base and I am switching them all to _s
Otto said text domain can't be same but I have no idea why tough.
I will be providing English pot/po/mo files in the theme so translators
don't even have to look into template files. Even then text domain can't be
same?
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
> That depends: do the "bunch of Themes" *use* a framework?
>
> And, related question (because internationalization isn't my strong suit):
> can a Theme make multiple calls to load_theme_textdomain()?
>
> If possible, this would be an elegant solution for a Theme shop that has
> several Themes that all use the same code library (framework):
>
> 1) Theme bootstraps the framework
> 2) Framework calls load_theme_textdomain( $framework_textdomain,
> $framework_path )
> 3) Theme calls load_theme_textdomain( $theme_textdomain, $theme_path )
>
> Would this even work? If not, why not? And if not, could it be *made* to
> work?
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I was hoping theme shops with a bunch of themes can get same exemption as
>> frameworks.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> I would still lean towards the general rule of thumb as Theme Name ~>
>>> theme slug = prefix = textdomain to maintain a consistency within the
>>> project's code.
>>>
>>> Edward Caissie
>>> aka Cais.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Thomas from ThemeZee <
>>> contact at themezee.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Author slug as function prefix should be fine. Beside the unique text
>>>> domain the handle (name of stylesheet) used in wp_register_style should
>>>> also be unique. Can cause some problems with child themes if you use the
>>>> author slug there and the user has multiple themes of your theme shop
>>>> installed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/7/27 Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me>
>>>>
>>>>> There you go :-) I was thinking that some special case Themes do that,
>>>>> but I was wrong.
>>>>> On Jul 27, 2013 3:06 AM, "Otto" <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Function prefix, sure. Text domain, no. This should be unique. Prefix
>>>>>> the text domain if you like.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Otto
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> > Can the text domain and function prefix be same for all my themes
>>>>>> and can it
>>>>>> > possibly be my theme shop name?
>>>>>> > It will be easy to maintain themes and create new ones.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130727/7a119b73/attachment.html>
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list