[theme-reviewers] Miss-linking or name clash?

[Zulfikar Nore]

Cheers for the clarification Amy - on with the review :0
Zulf

> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 09:39:43 -0400
> From: sabreuse at gmail.com
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Miss-linking or name clash?
> 
> Don't worry about those other theme names -- they aren't in the
> repository, and anyway, in this case, it's clearly (sorry!) a case of
> coincidentally using the same word, not trying to refer to or overtake
> another theme.
> 
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Zulfikar Nore <zulfikarnore at live.com> wrote:
> > Hello team,
> >
> > I'm about to review this ticket:
> > http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/12779
> >
> > As you can see the theme is attached/linked with two other unrelated themes
> > which were never approved, never
> > re-submitted as far as I can tell as they are not in the repository.
> >
> > Should I ignore the two other themes and carry on with the review or do I
> > treat this as a theme name clash falling under the
> > "Themes are not to use related Theme names (e.g. WP Twenty Eleven, Twenty
> > Eleven WP, The Twenty Eleven, etc.) in their name."
> > http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Theme_Name or is that in relation to
> > the default themes only?
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your advice on this,
> > Zulf
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130701/a1862751/attachment.html>