[theme-reviewers] Miss-linking or name clash?

[Greg Priday]

This happened to another one of my themes a while ago. It's because that
history just searches by the theme name prefix. So my theme called "Focus"
brought up a theme called "Focus on Basics".

When ever I encounter this I just ignore the unrelated themes.


On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Zulfikar Nore <zulfikarnore at live.com> wrote:

> Hello team,
>
> I'm about to review this ticket:
> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/12779
>
> As you can see the theme is attached/linked with two other unrelated
> themes which were never approved, never
> re-submitted as far as I can tell as they are not in the repository.
>
> Should I ignore the two other themes and carry on with the review or do I
> treat this as a theme name clash falling under the
> "Themes are *not* to use related Theme names (e.g. *WP Twenty Eleven*, *Twenty
> Eleven WP*, *The Twenty Eleven*, etc.) in their name."
> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Theme_Name or is that in relation
> to the default themes only?
>
> Thanks in advance for your advice on this,
> Zulf
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>


-- 
I make free WordPress themes
http://siteorigin.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130701/259b4caa/attachment.html>