[theme-reviewers] Theme Tag: Responsive

[Srikanth Koneru]

Congrats Emil, Whats next.
There should have been an auction :)


On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:

> Thanks Paul I really appreciate that :)
>
> Emil
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Paul Appleyard <paul at spacecat.com> wrote:
>
>>  Congrats, Emil!
>>
>>
>> https://cyberchimps.com/2013/02/cyberchimps-acquires-themeid-and-responsive-wordpress-theme/
>>
>> .. probably the wrong list for this but I thought it was worth a *wave*
>>
>>
>>
>> On 26/02/2013 3:28 PM, Emil Uzelac wrote:
>>
>> "mobile-friendly" is good, no doubt about that, however that is not
>> what people are searching for.
>>
>>  If we take Google keyword tool for example we'll see that folks are
>> not looking for these keywords.
>>
>>  "mobile ready design" returns 0 searches, while "responsive web design"
>>  shows about 200K monthly.
>>
>>  Not to disagree over the word "responsive" and I leave this entirely up
>> to Otto,
>> however Amy does have a solid point, "responsive" is no longer a fad,
>> it's a technique.
>>
>>  And it doesn't matter what we think about the word, "responsive" is
>> here to stay and it will grow even more this year.
>>
>>  Take a look at this link please:
>>
>> http://blog.lib.uiowa.edu/hardinmd/2012/05/03/responsive-design-sites-higher-ed-libraries-notables/
>>
>>  My experience is completely opposite from Justin's and I can count on a
>> single
>> hand how many clients asked me to build a "mobile-*" design.
>>
>>  Each month I design at least couple of sites and setup between 5-8.
>>
>>  Here's another proof<http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/responsive/stats/>:
>> tomorrow reaching half a million downloads 13% comes from
>> WPORG and the rest is from the search engines ;)
>>
>>  Now you be the judge what's really going on.
>>
>>  My 2¢
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Justin Tadlock <
>> justin at justintadlock.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm on board with a "mobile-friendly" or similarly-named tag but not
>>> "responsive".  I've set up probably 50+ sites for regular people over the
>>> past year.  Not a single one of those people knew what responsive meant.
>>>  Nearly all of them knew what mobile friendly/ready meant.
>>>
>>> Also, +1 to possibly overhauling the current tag system and adding more
>>> user-oriented tags.
>>>
>>> On 2/25/2013 8:21 PM, Daniel Fenn wrote:
>>>
>>>> Otto has a good point about the word responsive, it would be better if
>>>> it was mobile-friendly or something like that.
>>>>
>>>> Also while we are at it, can we add tags where themes are designed to
>>>> intergrate with different systems, for example my propress theme where
>>>> one can use it to have their forum look on their blog as well. (I know
>>>> it old but I am updating it and I think it almost ready to have the
>>>> reviewers pick at it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Merci Javier <mercijavier at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Amy Hendrix <sabreuse at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The whole point of the tag filter is to allow end-users to find things
>>>>>> more easily. Whether you think it's a buzzword or not, "Responsive"
>>>>>> has come
>>>>>> to be *very* widely used in the web design world over the course of
>>>>>> several
>>>>>> years. "Adaptive" has not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  What Amy said.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 on adding "responsive" tag.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing listtheme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.orghttp://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130227/db44cdb0/attachment-0001.htm>