[theme-reviewers] Theme Tag: Responsive

[Emil Uzelac]

Thanks Paul I really appreciate that :)

Emil


On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Paul Appleyard <paul at spacecat.com> wrote:

>  Congrats, Emil!
>
>
> https://cyberchimps.com/2013/02/cyberchimps-acquires-themeid-and-responsive-wordpress-theme/
>
> .. probably the wrong list for this but I thought it was worth a *wave*
>
>
>
> On 26/02/2013 3:28 PM, Emil Uzelac wrote:
>
> "mobile-friendly" is good, no doubt about that, however that is not
> what people are searching for.
>
>  If we take Google keyword tool for example we'll see that folks are
> not looking for these keywords.
>
>  "mobile ready design" returns 0 searches, while "responsive web design"
>  shows about 200K monthly.
>
>  Not to disagree over the word "responsive" and I leave this entirely up
> to Otto,
> however Amy does have a solid point, "responsive" is no longer a fad, it's
> a technique.
>
>  And it doesn't matter what we think about the word, "responsive" is
> here to stay and it will grow even more this year.
>
>  Take a look at this link please:
>
> http://blog.lib.uiowa.edu/hardinmd/2012/05/03/responsive-design-sites-higher-ed-libraries-notables/
>
>  My experience is completely opposite from Justin's and I can count on a
> single
> hand how many clients asked me to build a "mobile-*" design.
>
>  Each month I design at least couple of sites and setup between 5-8.
>
>  Here's another proof<http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/responsive/stats/>:
> tomorrow reaching half a million downloads 13% comes from
> WPORG and the rest is from the search engines ;)
>
>  Now you be the judge what's really going on.
>
>  My 2¢
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Justin Tadlock <justin at justintadlock.com
> > wrote:
>
>> I'm on board with a "mobile-friendly" or similarly-named tag but not
>> "responsive".  I've set up probably 50+ sites for regular people over the
>> past year.  Not a single one of those people knew what responsive meant.
>>  Nearly all of them knew what mobile friendly/ready meant.
>>
>> Also, +1 to possibly overhauling the current tag system and adding more
>> user-oriented tags.
>>
>> On 2/25/2013 8:21 PM, Daniel Fenn wrote:
>>
>>> Otto has a good point about the word responsive, it would be better if
>>> it was mobile-friendly or something like that.
>>>
>>> Also while we are at it, can we add tags where themes are designed to
>>> intergrate with different systems, for example my propress theme where
>>> one can use it to have their forum look on their blog as well. (I know
>>> it old but I am updating it and I think it almost ready to have the
>>> reviewers pick at it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Merci Javier <mercijavier at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Amy Hendrix <sabreuse at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The whole point of the tag filter is to allow end-users to find things
>>>>> more easily. Whether you think it's a buzzword or not, "Responsive"
>>>>> has come
>>>>> to be *very* widely used in the web design world over the course of
>>>>> several
>>>>> years. "Adaptive" has not.
>>>>>
>>>>>  What Amy said.
>>>>
>>>> +1 on adding "responsive" tag.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing listtheme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.orghttp://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130226/59bfe572/attachment.htm>