[theme-reviewers] Are the rules same for everyone?

[Chip Bennett]

I'll be the first to admit that the guideline in question isn't
particularly articulate or eloquent. The *intent* was to avoid just this
sort of scenario.

In hindsight, it might be better for that guideline to reference something
like "design-feature-descriptive" terms.

A term like "responsive" is appropriate for the Theme description, or
perhaps a keyword tag. As part of the Theme Name, the vast majority of the
time, it's placed there for the buzzword factor, and runs the risk of
confusion/conflict with other Theme names trying to market using that same
buzzword.

The idea for the Theme *Name* is that it should be something that
creatively describes and *sets apart* a given Theme.


On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com> wrote:

> @Dane - Exactly, that's the critical thinking part that's important for us
> to understand guidelines *within reason*. That's why they're called
> guidelines.
>
> That's why it's a judgment call on certain cases.
>
> Responsive is a tough one, it would have to be uniquely different to not
> be confused with Emil's theme.
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130225/24d8e889/attachment.htm>