[theme-reviewers] Question about child theming

Srikanth Koneru tskk79 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 22 20:44:53 UTC 2013

_s does the same thing, good idea.

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Josh Pollock <jpollock412 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Why don't we require that all functions be wrapped in if ( !
> function_exists( 'function_name') ) : wrappers? It seems to me like
> requiring this would make child themeing easier as a all functions from a
> parent theme could be easily over ridden from a child theme. Yes, I realize
> you can use remove_action and remove_filter but what about functions not
> hooked to filters or actions?
> I'm wondering if there is a reason for this or if my logic is flawed.
> Thanks,
> Josh
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20131223/3004c08f/attachment.html>

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list