[theme-reviewers] Tags and description.

[Josh Pollock]

OK. Start over. Let's discuss potential tags or other things like a support
URI link as if anything could be added. Foreach idea pros an cons as far as
does it help the user's experience, improve our lives as developers and
would we be able to come up with a reasonable guideline for reviews? Go!

For instance what about these tags:
responsive, mobile-friendly, mobile-optimized, mobile?

Photoblog, travelblog, videoblog, product site, community portal, cms?


On Wednesday, August 21, 2013, Emil Uzelac wrote:

> :-)
> On Aug 21, 2013 3:24 AM, "myazalea" <myazalea at hotmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'myazalea at hotmail.com');>>
> wrote:
>
>> Seems I missed some heated discussions in my year of absense...
>>
>>
>> How about a codex page explaining the tags. What exactly is a "featured
>> image header" compared to custom header and flexible header.  Sometimes its
>> not obvious.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Skickat från min Samsung Mobil
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Originalmeddelande --------
>> Från: Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>> 'emil at uzelac.me');>>
>> Datum: 21-08-2013 9:18 (GMT+01:00)
>> Till: "Discussion list for WordPress theme reviewers." <
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>> 'theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org');>>
>> Rubrik: Re: [theme-reviewers] Tags and description.
>>
>>
>> I know brother man. Values are worth nothing lately and please believe me
>> when I say that. Ideas? I have them every few hours. Great and not so
>> great. There's one thing for sure. You will always find a douche who will
>> shut you down out of the gelaousy of some sort, or simply because he/she
>> doesn't even understand or there is a troll or two around. When this
>> changes, we will be #1. Till that time, enjoy the bumpy ride. So yes,
>> support is still nogo.
>> On Aug 21, 2013 2:05 AM, "Bryan Hadaway" <bhadaway at gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'bhadaway at gmail.com');>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The value of an idea in this context comes from the community's
>>> perspective, not the person making it. Just because you changed your mind
>>> doesn't automatically devalue the idea and make it moot or a mistake.
>>>
>>> Credit goes to you for the idea whether you see that as a positive or
>>> not, but once the idea is out it's a collective idea that is no longer your
>>> own. From what I remember, most theme authors definitely wanted this, as
>>> many authors do indeed have an official Support URI, as an optional meta
>>> field this never would have hurt those that don't.
>>>
>>> It was never a give and take type proposal. It was something that would
>>> benefit say 50% of theme authors and have no effect whatsoever on the other
>>> 50%.
>>>
>>> Granted, it's clear this idea was shot down and will never see the light
>>> of day again, this is merely an introspective conversation at this point
>>> since it came up again.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>>> 'theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org');>
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>> 'theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org');>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130821/c13f40bc/attachment-0001.html>