[theme-reviewers] Tags and description.

[Emil Uzelac]

:-)
On Aug 21, 2013 3:24 AM, "myazalea" <myazalea at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Seems I missed some heated discussions in my year of absense...
>
>
> How about a codex page explaining the tags. What exactly is a "featured
> image header" compared to custom header and flexible header.  Sometimes its
> not obvious.
>
>
>
>
> Skickat från min Samsung Mobil
>
>
>
> -------- Originalmeddelande --------
> Från: Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me>
> Datum: 21-08-2013 9:18 (GMT+01:00)
> Till: "Discussion list for WordPress theme reviewers." <
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Rubrik: Re: [theme-reviewers] Tags and description.
>
>
> I know brother man. Values are worth nothing lately and please believe me
> when I say that. Ideas? I have them every few hours. Great and not so
> great. There's one thing for sure. You will always find a douche who will
> shut you down out of the gelaousy of some sort, or simply because he/she
> doesn't even understand or there is a troll or two around. When this
> changes, we will be #1. Till that time, enjoy the bumpy ride. So yes,
> support is still nogo.
> On Aug 21, 2013 2:05 AM, "Bryan Hadaway" <bhadaway at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The value of an idea in this context comes from the community's
>> perspective, not the person making it. Just because you changed your mind
>> doesn't automatically devalue the idea and make it moot or a mistake.
>>
>> Credit goes to you for the idea whether you see that as a positive or
>> not, but once the idea is out it's a collective idea that is no longer your
>> own. From what I remember, most theme authors definitely wanted this, as
>> many authors do indeed have an official Support URI, as an optional meta
>> field this never would have hurt those that don't.
>>
>> It was never a give and take type proposal. It was something that would
>> benefit say 50% of theme authors and have no effect whatsoever on the other
>> 50%.
>>
>> Granted, it's clear this idea was shot down and will never see the light
>> of day again, this is merely an introspective conversation at this point
>> since it came up again.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130821/febe9b30/attachment-0001.html>