[theme-reviewers] Coding Standard

[Chip Bennett]

This.

The Guidelines - i.e. the things that are *required* - are in one place
only: the Theme Review Codex page:
http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review

The Make/Themes site is used to discuss the guidelines; if anything is
formalized, it will be added to the Codex page. There are things that we
occasionally miss, so if you have any specific Guidelines that were decided
on the Make/Themes site, but not added to the Codex, please bring them up,
and we'll make sure the Codex is accurate.

Thanks,

Chip


On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Amy Hendrix <sabreuse at gmail.com> wrote:

> If that's a common occurrence (and I haven't been reviewing enough
> lately to know how common it really is), then that's a MAJOR problem.
> The Make site is where changes to the guidelines are *discussed*, but
> it's the nature of such discussions that not all points that are
> discussed are actually adopted as guidelines.
>
> To put it bluntly, reviewers, please DO NOT say things are required if
> they aren't actually required in the Review Guidelines. Passing the
> review process is difficult already; we absolutely need to have a
> clear and consistently enforced set of guidelines. There are enough
> complaints out there that the guidelines are arbitrary and constantly
> changing without people saying things are required when they're not.
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > can't recall any instantly, but reviewers usually point to make site and
> > state that its a required issue even tough its not mentioned on org
> > guidelines.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> What policies, specifically?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> A few policies are formulated on make site but they don't make it to
> >>> guidelines on .org
> >>> so these policies are only recommended then?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes. At the moment, the Coding and CSS standards are only
> *recommended*.
> >>>> Making them *required* may be a bridge we cross at some point, but
> we're not
> >>>> there right now.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If this does not cause any issues, I would say recommended.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Emil
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Stephen Cui <scui2005 at gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> During the theme review, my theme has a "required issue" for next
> >>>>>> version:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There are inconsistency in spacing around parenthesis throughout the
> >>>>>> theme. Recommend to read the WordPress? PHP coding standards.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> http://make.wordpress.org/core/handbook/coding-standards/php/#space-usage
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have no problem to make such changes as it is good practice. I
> also
> >>>>>> take the chance to revisit the code.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My question is " is it required?" or "just recommended".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Stephen
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130429/93de416c/attachment.html>