[theme-reviewers] What do you think of this author url

Mon Sep 10 02:48:37 UTC 2012

You disagreeing or criticizing is not the problem. Its the stfu tone in
your previous email.

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, exactly, agreed. You started a discussion and several of us expressed
> our opinions and/or disagreements and/or concerns, except for the admins
> because generally what they say isn't opinion, it's authoritative (as in
> what they say goes). No one was rude. Because someone disagrees with you or
> criticizes something you say does not mean they're being rude/mean/personal.
>
> If you pose an issue to a whole email list of people asking for their
> opinion you're going to indeed get it. So your last statements are ironic,
> clearly you map out your understanding of debate/discussion and then
> contradict yourself within that statement of "understanding" by not being
> understanding.
>
> Am I being rude now or arguing or was I ever being rude? No, still just
> discussing and directly, appropriately, intelligently and validly
> responding to your responses, though now off-topic. You can *think* I'm
> rude or you can *understand* that I'm straightforward and honest. That I
> speak my mind and say what I mean and mean what I say.
>
> In any case we're now just beating a dead horse, as in the admins have
> already spoken on the subject (probably why they feel no need to further
> engage). Am I trying to one-up you or be confrontational, no, this isn't
> reddit, we're a group of volunteers discussing things that interest/matter
> to us. I engage in conversations I have interest or stock in. Clearly, you
> can see that my responses are thoughtful, detailed and well-rounded, not
> blatant trolling. Anything else, is what YOU read into it which I certainly
> have no control over.
>
> At this point, anything further is strictly conversation out of pure
> interest/understanding which is fine if you'd still like to discuss, so
> long as you *actually* understand what you yourself are saying in your
> last statement and practice that understanding instead of just saying it.
> But, the specific/original subject at hand feels pretty much concluded.
>
>
> Thanks, Bryan
>
>
> Bryan Phillip Hadaway
>
>
> Web & Graphic Designer
> calmestghost.com
> bhadaway at gmail.com
>
>
> *Socialize:* Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/calmestghost> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/calmestghost> |
> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/calmestghost> | Google+<https://plus.google.com/104582075016689917593>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> A little tolerance towards people with differing views is not too much to
>> ask in this age, is it?
>>
>> Agreeing, disagreeing, expressing concern is part of discussion, no need
>> to be rude about it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> This is ridiculous. Why is this even up for discussion any more? The
>>> name is legit, the site is legit, the theme is legit. In any case, Chip, an
>>> admin, has spoken on the subject. This just sounds personal and petty.
>>> Don't be subjective, be objective.
>>>
>>> Doesn't matter what the domain has been through in the past, that
>>> happens sometimes. Frankly, the behavior of some on the review team going
>>> to great lengths to investigate this matter seems more questionable than
>>> this person's choice in a URL/site/brand name which is really none of our
>>> business anyways. Can you say witch hunt?
>>>
>>> If anyone denies this theme based solely on it's name/URL (given that
>>> you only subjectively don't get it or otherwise disagree with it) as
>>> apposed to it actually having design or function flaws you're ethically
>>> wrong, period and this is what will need to be examined further. As Chip
>>> said which anyone with half a sense agrees with, words have many meanings,
>>> especially from culture to culture or even person to person, especially
>>> creatives. Look at how many words we simply make up on a daily basis.
>>>
>>> If this is somehow found to be spam later, remove it. It's hardly
>>> creating a precedence for spammers, who's going to know, who's going to
>>> care? Look at the scrutiny that's already put on the themes, look at how
>>> many themes even make it into the repo in the first place. I think the
>>> world of WordPress theme reviews will be fine.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Bryan
>>>
>>>
>>> Bryan Phillip Hadaway
>>>
>>>
>>> Web & Graphic Designer
>>> calmestghost.com
>>> bhadaway at gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> *Socialize:* Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/calmestghost> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/calmestghost> |
>>> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/calmestghost> | Google+<https://plus.google.com/104582075016689917593>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 3:00 PM, <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes its a dangerous precedent.
>>>>
>>>> Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com>
>>>> Sender: theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 15:59:38
>>>> To: <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>> Reply-To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] What do you think of this author url
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120910/a58616fd/attachment.htm>