[theme-reviewers] What do you think of this author url

[Daniel Fenn]

Well for some people it is, are we getting to the point where it too much
to ask for anything in today's world? I hope not otherwise we will get to
the point where we can't ask a thing without worrying about anything.








On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:

> A little tolerance towards people with differing views is not too much to
> ask in this age, is it?
>
> Agreeing, disagreeing, expressing concern is part of discussion, no need
> to be rude about it.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is ridiculous. Why is this even up for discussion any more? The name
>> is legit, the site is legit, the theme is legit. In any case, Chip, an
>> admin, has spoken on the subject. This just sounds personal and petty.
>> Don't be subjective, be objective.
>>
>> Doesn't matter what the domain has been through in the past, that happens
>> sometimes. Frankly, the behavior of some on the review team going to great
>> lengths to investigate this matter seems more questionable than this
>> person's choice in a URL/site/brand name which is really none of our
>> business anyways. Can you say witch hunt?
>>
>> If anyone denies this theme based solely on it's name/URL (given that you
>> only subjectively don't get it or otherwise disagree with it) as apposed to
>> it actually having design or function flaws you're ethically wrong, period
>> and this is what will need to be examined further. As Chip said which
>> anyone with half a sense agrees with, words have many meanings, especially
>> from culture to culture or even person to person, especially creatives.
>> Look at how many words we simply make up on a daily basis.
>>
>> If this is somehow found to be spam later, remove it. It's hardly
>> creating a precedence for spammers, who's going to know, who's going to
>> care? Look at the scrutiny that's already put on the themes, look at how
>> many themes even make it into the repo in the first place. I think the
>> world of WordPress theme reviews will be fine.
>>
>> Thanks, Bryan
>>
>>
>> Bryan Phillip Hadaway
>>
>>
>> Web & Graphic Designer
>> calmestghost.com
>> bhadaway at gmail.com
>>
>>
>> *Socialize:* Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/calmestghost> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/calmestghost> |
>> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/calmestghost> | Google+<https://plus.google.com/104582075016689917593>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 3:00 PM, <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes its a dangerous precedent.
>>>
>>> Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com>
>>> Sender: theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org
>>> Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 15:59:38
>>> To: <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>> Reply-To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] What do you think of this author url
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120910/fbec9bda/attachment-0001.htm>