[theme-reviewers] What happened here?

[Emil Uzelac]

Amen to that :)

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> p.s. your ticket has a lot of activity now. :)
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Mats Birch <birch at birchware.se> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for a very clarifying, and fast, answer.
>> For an outsider like me, it's rather hard to figure out how things work.
>> You gave me another piece of the jigsaw.  Thanks.
>>
>>
>> On 2012-03-09 00:03, Amy Hendrix wrote:
>>
>>> Whenever you upload a new version, add a comment to the previous one
>>> with a link to the new ticket -- your reviewer won't automatically see
>>> the new ticket, but they *will* continue to get messages from the old
>>> one, even after it's closed, and pick up the new version (as long as
>>> you upload a new one within a few days, as you did).
>>>
>>> If you've done that, you may need to wait more than an hour for them
>>> to pick up the new ticket: we're spread across time zones and have
>>> jobs and families, after all ;) There's no need to worry about which
>>> category your theme ended up in: while the previously-approved or
>>> previously-not-approved label is determined by your most recent
>>> review, your reviewer will know to pick it up whichever bucket it
>>> happens to be in.
>>>
>>> Questions/clarifications about the specifics of the review are
>>> probably best handled in-ticket, because they know your specific case
>>> better than the rest of us, and anyway, it's best for future versions
>>> to have the whole ticket history behind them.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Mats Birch<birch at birchware.se>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've got a question for you, who know how these things work.
>>>>
>>>> I just upgraded my theme, and got a "not approved" review. I am a bit
>>>> curious, because none of the things remarked upon have been changed
>>>> since
>>>> the previous version were approved, with no mentions of those things.
>>>>
>>>> How did that happen?
>>>>
>>>> I of course fixed, within an hour, most of it, and commented on the
>>>> ticked,
>>>> asking if I had done enough.
>>>> I got no answer.
>>>> Is that because a reviewer is disconnected from a ticket once they
>>>> closed
>>>> it?
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, I uploaded it anyway (what else to do?) and, much to my
>>>> surprise, I
>>>> found it in the "Priorty 3 queue", last of the last, so to speak.
>>>> Wouldn't
>>>> it be smoother if the reviewer could check the new one while he/she
>>>> sort of
>>>> knows it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The theme's last ticket is: http://themes.trac.wordpress.**
>>>> org/ticket/6839 <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/6839>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>
>>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120308/1cd34ee1/attachment.htm>