[theme-reviewers] What happened here?

[Chip Bennett]

p.s. your ticket has a lot of activity now. :)

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Mats Birch <birch at birchware.se> wrote:

> Thank you for a very clarifying, and fast, answer.
> For an outsider like me, it's rather hard to figure out how things work.
> You gave me another piece of the jigsaw.  Thanks.
>
>
> On 2012-03-09 00:03, Amy Hendrix wrote:
>
>> Whenever you upload a new version, add a comment to the previous one
>> with a link to the new ticket -- your reviewer won't automatically see
>> the new ticket, but they *will* continue to get messages from the old
>> one, even after it's closed, and pick up the new version (as long as
>> you upload a new one within a few days, as you did).
>>
>> If you've done that, you may need to wait more than an hour for them
>> to pick up the new ticket: we're spread across time zones and have
>> jobs and families, after all ;) There's no need to worry about which
>> category your theme ended up in: while the previously-approved or
>> previously-not-approved label is determined by your most recent
>> review, your reviewer will know to pick it up whichever bucket it
>> happens to be in.
>>
>> Questions/clarifications about the specifics of the review are
>> probably best handled in-ticket, because they know your specific case
>> better than the rest of us, and anyway, it's best for future versions
>> to have the whole ticket history behind them.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Mats Birch<birch at birchware.se>  wrote:
>>
>>> I've got a question for you, who know how these things work.
>>>
>>> I just upgraded my theme, and got a "not approved" review. I am a bit
>>> curious, because none of the things remarked upon have been changed since
>>> the previous version were approved, with no mentions of those things.
>>>
>>> How did that happen?
>>>
>>> I of course fixed, within an hour, most of it, and commented on the
>>> ticked,
>>> asking if I had done enough.
>>> I got no answer.
>>> Is that because a reviewer is disconnected from a ticket once they closed
>>> it?
>>>
>>> Anyway, I uploaded it anyway (what else to do?) and, much to my
>>> surprise, I
>>> found it in the "Priorty 3 queue", last of the last, so to speak.
>>> Wouldn't
>>> it be smoother if the reviewer could check the new one while he/she sort
>>> of
>>> knows it?
>>>
>>>
>>> The theme's last ticket is: http://themes.trac.wordpress.**
>>> org/ticket/6839 <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/6839>
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120308/ad999965/attachment.htm>