[theme-reviewers] "responsive" themes

[Bryce]

Sure, by definition it's responsive, but if it can't even respond to
<480px, users will be extremely disappointed. A note in the readme wouldn't
be enough imo. I think in order for it to be referred to as 'responsive',
it must be responsive to pretty much all sizes.



On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Kirk Wight <kwight at kwight.ca> wrote:

> What are reviewers' thoughts on testing themes claiming to be responsive?
>
> I know we don't have any official guidelines, nor a tag for it in the
> repo. But I'm looking at a theme whose menus and sidebar fall apart at
> 480px - certainly not what a user would be expecting from a responsive
> theme.
>
> Maybe a RECOMMEND to correct, and a REQUIRE in readme to note where it
> breaks?
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120716/1e27303f/attachment.htm>