Sure, by definition it's responsive, but if it can't even respond to <480px, users will be extremely disappointed. A note in the readme wouldn't be enough imo. I think in order for it to be referred to as 'responsive', it must be responsive to pretty much all sizes.<div>
<br></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Kirk Wight <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kwight@kwight.ca" target="_blank">kwight@kwight.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
What are reviewers' thoughts on testing themes claiming to be responsive?<div><br></div><div>I know we don't have any official guidelines, nor a tag for it in the repo. But I'm looking at a theme whose menus and sidebar fall apart at 480px - certainly not what a user would be expecting from a responsive theme.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Maybe a RECOMMEND to correct, and a REQUIRE in readme to note where it breaks?</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>