[theme-reviewers] Is this now a requirement for submitted themes?

[Shinra Web Holdings]

Yes, it's required now. Plugin authors were getting mad that they couldn't
fully change the title (since bloginfo('name') was typically hardcoded in,
so now it is required to use the wp_title filter. I put a function on the
codex page that you can pretty much take verbatim.

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Konstantin Obenland
<konstantin at obenland.it>wrote:

> I don't know how others see it, but I would't consider it urgent enough
> for immediate action. Just have it fixed the next time you get around to
> submitting an update. :)
>
> Konstantin
>
> On 03.07.2012, at 11:29, esmi at quirm dot net wrote:
>
> > on 03/07/2012 08:00 Konstantin Obenland said the following:
> >> Your Theme was first approved almost two years ago and a lot has
> >> changed since then. If you want to stay on top of all changes, you
> >> might want to check out the Theme Review Codex page regularly and/or
> >> weigh in on the discussions we have on make.wordpress.org/themes for
> >> new and changing requirements.
> >
> > I do try to do both but somehow this slipped past me. :-) Are you ok for
> the theme to be released on the Repo "as is"? Or would you prefer me to
> re-submit an amended version?  I have 3 other themes I'm updating and I
> don't want to give you guys even more work if it can be avoided.
> >
> > Mel
> > --
> > http://quirm.net
> > http://blackwidows.co.uk
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120703/d2a1f4b9/attachment.htm>