[theme-reviewers] splitting reviewers between queues
Angelo Bertolli
angelo.bertolli at gmail.com
Thu Jan 26 15:28:24 UTC 2012
I thought once you get rejected, you get sent to #3 the next time, even
if your theme is already on extend... shouldn't the priority to get bug
fixes out apply to anything that's on extend?
On 01/26/2012 10:15 AM, Chip Bennett wrote:
> ...and also - equally importantly - as an incentive for developers of
> already approved Themes to continue to submit improvements and bugfixes
> for their Themes. It is imperative that Themes already in use by end
> users have an expedited path to approval of such bugfixes and updates.
>
> Chip
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Edward Caissie
> <edward.caissie at gmail.com <mailto:edward.caissie at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> The essential premises of the Trac review priority is still one of
> FIFO (First-In First-Out).
> The ideas behind the Priority queues was to facilitate quicker
> reviewers of known themes; and to help identify themes for reviewers
> so they are aware of any history that may be involved.
>
> For example a custom query such as this one:
> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/query?owner=&status=new&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=type&col=priority&col=time&col=changetime&order=time
> <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/query?owner=&status=new&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=type&col=priority&col=time&col=changetime&order=time>
> shows a list of all open tickets (168 at the moment) where the one
> at the top should be the prime priority theme. The Priority queues
> were introduced to quickly pick out those themes (ideally previously
> approved in their last submission) to pick the "low hanging fruit".
>
>
> Cais.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Chandra Maharzan
> <maharzan at gmail.com <mailto:maharzan at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> This would be great. I haven't seen queue 2, 3 moving at all for
> a long time. :)
>
> 2012/1/26 futeng.org <http://futeng.org> <bbq at futeng.org
> <mailto:bbq at futeng.org>>:
> > I hope so!
> >
> >
> > ------------------ Original ------------------
> > From: "Kirk Wight";
> > Date: 2012年1月26日(星期四) 晚上10:25
> > To: "theme-reviewers";
> > Subject: [theme-reviewers] splitting reviewers between queues
> >
> > Hello reviewers,
> >
> > I'm wondering if we should consider splitting reviewers between
> some
> > different queues, just to keep all queues moving.
> >
> > I haven't seen queue 1 empty yet myself since the "getting back
> on track"
> > changes in December. I've also noticed that queue 1 can get a
> bit dominated
> > if submitters are quite active (no fault of their own -
> obviously we need to
> > keep encouraging regular updates to themes).
> >
> > Maybe, for now, we could assign a reviewer to each of queues 2,
> 3 and 4, and
> > everyone else plugs away as always?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
>
>
>
> --
> cmans
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list