[theme-reviewers] splitting reviewers between queues

[Chip Bennett]

...and also - equally importantly - as an incentive for developers of
already approved Themes to continue to submit improvements and bugfixes for
their Themes. It is imperative that Themes already in use by end users have
an expedited path to approval of such bugfixes and updates.

Chip

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:

> The essential premises of the Trac review priority is still one of FIFO
> (First-In First-Out).
> The ideas behind the Priority queues was to facilitate quicker reviewers
> of known themes; and to help identify themes for reviewers so they are
> aware of any history that may be involved.
>
> For example a custom query such as this one:
> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/query?owner=&status=new&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=type&col=priority&col=time&col=changetime&order=timeshows a list of all open tickets (168 at the moment) where the one at the
> top should be the prime priority theme. The Priority queues were introduced
> to quickly pick out those themes (ideally previously approved in their last
> submission) to pick the "low hanging fruit".
>
>
> Cais.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Chandra Maharzan <maharzan at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> This would be great. I haven't seen queue 2, 3 moving at all for a long
>> time. :)
>>
>> 2012/1/26 futeng.org <bbq at futeng.org>:
>> > I hope so!
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------ Original ------------------
>> > From: "Kirk Wight";
>> > Date: 2012年1月26日(星期四) 晚上10:25
>> > To: "theme-reviewers";
>> > Subject: [theme-reviewers] splitting reviewers between queues
>> >
>> > Hello reviewers,
>> >
>> > I'm wondering if we should consider splitting reviewers between some
>> > different queues, just to keep all queues moving.
>> >
>> > I haven't seen queue 1 empty yet myself since the "getting back on
>> track"
>> > changes in December. I've also noticed that queue 1 can get a bit
>> dominated
>> > if submitters are quite active (no fault of their own - obviously we
>> need to
>> > keep encouraging regular updates to themes).
>> >
>> > Maybe, for now, we could assign a reviewer to each of queues 2, 3 and
>> 4, and
>> > everyone else plugs away as always?
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> cmans
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120126/9ae1474d/attachment.htm>