[theme-reviewers] unable to upload please advice

[Edward Caissie]

I'm actually proposing something much more simpler:

The oldest version that may be currently supported is 3.2; although it is
> strongly recommended the oldest version currently supported be 3.3.
>

Leave out the relativity of the version ... just simply state what the
versions are.


Cais.


On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Tom Barrett <tcbarrett at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi folks
>
> I personally find the previous and current wording ambiguous/unclear. Too
> many negatives and easily taking out of context. Apologies for stirring
> things up, but would this wording help (be acceptable):
>
> - Themes must not provide backward compatibility for out-of-date versions
> of WordPress.
>  = This includes the use of conditional function_exists() wrappers.
>  = Versions are considered out of date if they are 3 versions (or more)
> behind the current version. The current version is 3.4 which means version
> 3.1 is out of date.
> - Theme should not support backward compatibility for the version which
> will become out of date with the next release. Avoid supporting version 3.2
> as it will soon become out of date.
>
> It's easier to track back the meaning of the words?
>
> Tom
>
> --
> http://www.tcbarrett.com | http://gplus.to/tcbarrett |
> http://twitter.com/tcbarrett
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120823/b5c36c98/attachment-0001.htm>