[theme-reviewers] stop replying to "theme-reviewers Digest...."
CONNOR Wayne and Jill
wayne at dubbo.org
Thu Aug 9 02:19:07 UTC 2012
Oops!
Thanks,
Wayne
On 09/08/2012, at 12:05 PM, theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org wrote:
> Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 27, Issue 36 (Daniel Fenn)
> 2. Re: theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 27, Issue 36 (Bryan Hadaway)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:01:43 +1000
> From: Daniel Fenn <danielx386 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 27, Issue
> 36
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Message-ID:
> <CAJ5Hi2h6rHfu-2bV1ie8cpydF1UrtcvnEL1QJRBdXKSTSHTb8Q at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> No, what I was saying is that you reply to the topic tread, and not
> the digest emails.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel Fenn
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Isn't this the very purpose of this email group, to discuss things like
>> this? If you don't have any personal interest or input in a specific email,
>> just ignore the email, right?
>>
>>
>> Bryan Phillip Hadaway
>>
>>
>> Web & Graphic Designer
>> calmestghost.com
>> bhadaway at gmail.com
>>
>>
>> Socialize: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Google+
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Daniel Fenn <danielx386 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Can you please stop replying to "theme-reviewers Digest...." email as
>>> not many of us will read or even answer then?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Daniel Fenn
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:52 AM, CONNOR Wayne and Jill <wayne at dubbo.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> This is the same issue I had with my slidingdoor theme that I made about
>>>> 3 years ago.
>>>>
>>>> You can see a demo here:
>>>>
>>>> http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/sliding-door
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Using home_url() doesn't work because it makes the person previewing the
>>>> theme may think that clicking on the sliding menu just returns you to the
>>>> home page. It's not actually obvious that they can be linked somewhere else.
>>>>
>>>> Let me say it was tempting to put some of my own commercial or personal
>>>> URLs in these links, because they essentially bypass the link checking of
>>>> the review process. Also these links disappear automatically as soon as the
>>>> end user creates their own pages.
>>>>
>>>> I decided just to use theme URLs on the links at the time because I
>>>> thought that was the intention of the WordPress guidelines.
>>>>
>>>> I would think that if they are not a permanent part of the theme (like a
>>>> footer link) then using EITHER (1) wordpress.org or (2) the theme URL or (3)
>>>> the author URL or (4) example.com or (5) home_url() would give enough
>>>> options, but not a different URL.
>>>>
>>>> If you don't have guidelines you'll get all sorts of jokers linking to
>>>> all sorts of places.
>>>>
>>>> Wayne
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 09/08/2012, at 10:45 AM, theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>
>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>>> theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>
>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>>> theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>
>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>>> than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Re: Feature slider default links (Daniel Tara)
>>>>> 2. Re: Feature slider default links (Justin Tadlock)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Message: 1
>>>>> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 03:35:57 +0300
>>>>> From: Daniel Tara <contact at onedesigns.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Feature slider default links
>>>>> To: "theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org"
>>>>> <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>> Message-ID: <6052357002005747691 at unknownmsgid>
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>>>
>>>>> Why not link to something like www.example.com? It's generally
>>>>> accepted
>>>>> that's a domain used for demonstration purposes, nobody would question
>>>>> if
>>>>> you'd use that.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09.08.2012, at 03:33, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> How so? Can you explain how you're attempting to show this custom URL
>>>>> functionality? Perhaps I'm just not following you. Are you talking
>>>>> about a
>>>>> Theme demo? Are you talking about the default custom URLs that appear
>>>>> in
>>>>> the Theme options page? Something else?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Trent Lapinski
>>>>> <trent at cyberchimps.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> @Chip
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suppose I could but that doesn't really show the custom URL
>>>>>> functionality.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would rather just get an exception.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Trent Lapinski
>>>>>> =============
>>>>>> CEO of CyberChimps LLC
>>>>>> trent at cyberchimps.com
>>>>>> Mobile (714) 904-4280
>>>>>> Twitter @trentlapinski
>>>>>> http://CyberChimps.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 8, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why not have them link to home_url() by default, instead?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Trent Lapinski
>>>>>> <trent at cyberchimps.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some of my themes have feature sliders, and for the default links for
>>>>>>> those slides I simply link them back to my company website to show
>>>>>>> users
>>>>>>> can link the images in the feature slider.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It was recently brought to my attention that this may be a grey area
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> terms of the guidelines. I spoke to Otto about this at WCSF12, and he
>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>> it likely shouldn't be too big of an issue and I should be able to
>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>> an exception to keep these links.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With that said, I would like to formally request an exception to have
>>>>>>> these default links. I can have them direct to theme specific pages
>>>>>>> perhaps?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --Trent Lapinski
>>>>>>> =============
>>>>>>> CEO of CyberChimps LLC
>>>>>>> trent at cyberchimps.com
>>>>>>> Mobile (714) 904-4280
>>>>>>> Twitter @trentlapinski
>>>>>>> http://CyberChimps.com <http://cyberchimps.com/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>> URL:
>>>>> <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120809/fcd543ea/attachment-0001.htm>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Message: 2
>>>>> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:45:18 -0500
>>>>> From: Justin Tadlock <justin at justintadlock.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Feature slider default links
>>>>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> Message-ID: <5023081E.1040307 at justintadlock.com>
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>>>>>
>>>>> Why not just make the slider work without a link? I assume you're
>>>>> displaying some sort of image slider and each image is wrapped in a
>>>>> link. It makes sense to me that if the user doesn't add a link, the
>>>>> individual slide doesn't need to link anywhere. It gives users an
>>>>> extra
>>>>> option if they want to use it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/8/2012 6:54 PM, Trent Lapinski wrote:
>>>>>> @Chip
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suppose I could but that doesn't really show the custom URL
>>>>>> functionality.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would rather just get an exception.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Trent Lapinski
>>>>>> =============
>>>>>> CEO of CyberChimps LLC
>>>>>> trent at cyberchimps.com <mailto:trent at cyberchimps.com>
>>>>>> Mobile (714) 904-4280
>>>>>> Twitter @trentlapinski
>>>>>> http://CyberChimps.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 8, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net
>>>>>> <mailto:chip at chipbennett.net>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why not have them link to home_url() by default, instead?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Trent Lapinski <trent at cyberchimps.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:trent at cyberchimps.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some of my themes have feature sliders, and for the default links
>>>>>>> for those slides I simply link them back to my company website to
>>>>>>> show users can link the images in the feature slider.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It was recently brought to my attention that this may be a grey
>>>>>>> area in terms of the guidelines. I spoke to Otto about this at
>>>>>>> WCSF12, and he said it likely shouldn't be too big of an issue
>>>>>>> and I should be able to request an exception to keep these links.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With that said, I would like to formally request an exception to
>>>>>>> have these default links. I can have them direct to theme
>>>>>>> specific pages perhaps?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --Trent Lapinski
>>>>>>> =============
>>>>>>> CEO of CyberChimps LLC
>>>>>>> trent at cyberchimps.com <mailto:trent at cyberchimps.com>
>>>>>>> Mobile (714) 904-4280 <tel:%28714%29%20904-4280>
>>>>>>> Twitter @trentlapinski
>>>>>>> http://CyberChimps.com <http://cyberchimps.com/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>> URL:
>>>>> <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120808/991e6d1e/attachment.htm>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 27, Issue 36
>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 19:05:49 -0700
> From: Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 27, Issue
> 36
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Message-ID:
> <CAP3jXhRQGEhZ2L-dxWVAYuzCJmUutZNimyTp4OPL2MczJRSgyA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Oh you're referring to:
>
> http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/
>
> I don't think everyone is aware of that, so there's the link.
>
> It's extremely convenient to just comment by email so I wonder if this
> bothers everyone else?
>
>
> Bryan Phillip Hadaway
>
>
> Web & Graphic Designer
> calmestghost.com
> bhadaway at gmail.com
>
>
> *Socialize:* Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/calmestghost> |
> Twitter<http://twitter.com/calmestghost> |
> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/calmestghost> |
> Google+<https://plus.google.com/104582075016689917593>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Daniel Fenn <danielx386 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> No, what I was saying is that you reply to the topic tread, and not
>> the digest emails.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Daniel Fenn
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Isn't this the very purpose of this email group, to discuss things like
>>> this? If you don't have any personal interest or input in a specific
>> email,
>>> just ignore the email, right?
>>>
>>>
>>> Bryan Phillip Hadaway
>>>
>>>
>>> Web & Graphic Designer
>>> calmestghost.com
>>> bhadaway at gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Socialize: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Google+
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Daniel Fenn <danielx386 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Can you please stop replying to "theme-reviewers Digest...." email as
>>>> not many of us will read or even answer then?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Daniel Fenn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:52 AM, CONNOR Wayne and Jill <wayne at dubbo.org
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> This is the same issue I had with my slidingdoor theme that I made
>> about
>>>>> 3 years ago.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can see a demo here:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/sliding-door
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Using home_url() doesn't work because it makes the person previewing
>> the
>>>>> theme may think that clicking on the sliding menu just returns you to
>> the
>>>>> home page. It's not actually obvious that they can be linked
>> somewhere else.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me say it was tempting to put some of my own commercial or
>> personal
>>>>> URLs in these links, because they essentially bypass the link
>> checking of
>>>>> the review process. Also these links disappear automatically as soon
>> as the
>>>>> end user creates their own pages.
>>>>>
>>>>> I decided just to use theme URLs on the links at the time because I
>>>>> thought that was the intention of the WordPress guidelines.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would think that if they are not a permanent part of the theme
>> (like a
>>>>> footer link) then using EITHER (1) wordpress.org or (2) the theme
>> URL or (3)
>>>>> the author URL or (4) example.com or (5) home_url() would give enough
>>>>> options, but not a different URL.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you don't have guidelines you'll get all sorts of jokers linking to
>>>>> all sorts of places.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wayne
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/08/2012, at 10:45 AM,
>> theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>>>> theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>>>> theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>>>> than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. Re: Feature slider default links (Daniel Tara)
>>>>>> 2. Re: Feature slider default links (Justin Tadlock)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Message: 1
>>>>>> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 03:35:57 +0300
>>>>>> From: Daniel Tara <contact at onedesigns.com>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Feature slider default links
>>>>>> To: "theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org"
>>>>>> <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>>> Message-ID: <6052357002005747691 at unknownmsgid>
>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why not link to something like www.example.com? It's generally
>>>>>> accepted
>>>>>> that's a domain used for demonstration purposes, nobody would
>> question
>>>>>> if
>>>>>> you'd use that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09.08.2012, at 03:33, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How so? Can you explain how you're attempting to show this custom URL
>>>>>> functionality? Perhaps I'm just not following you. Are you talking
>>>>>> about a
>>>>>> Theme demo? Are you talking about the default custom URLs that appear
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the Theme options page? Something else?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Trent Lapinski
>>>>>> <trent at cyberchimps.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @Chip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I suppose I could but that doesn't really show the custom URL
>>>>>>> functionality.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would rather just get an exception.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --Trent Lapinski
>>>>>>> =============
>>>>>>> CEO of CyberChimps LLC
>>>>>>> trent at cyberchimps.com
>>>>>>> Mobile (714) 904-4280
>>>>>>> Twitter @trentlapinski
>>>>>>> http://CyberChimps.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 8, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why not have them link to home_url() by default, instead?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Trent Lapinski
>>>>>>> <trent at cyberchimps.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some of my themes have feature sliders, and for the default links
>> for
>>>>>>>> those slides I simply link them back to my company website to show
>>>>>>>> users
>>>>>>>> can link the images in the feature slider.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It was recently brought to my attention that this may be a grey
>> area
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> terms of the guidelines. I spoke to Otto about this at WCSF12, and
>> he
>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>> it likely shouldn't be too big of an issue and I should be able to
>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>> an exception to keep these links.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With that said, I would like to formally request an exception to
>> have
>>>>>>>> these default links. I can have them direct to theme specific pages
>>>>>>>> perhaps?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --Trent Lapinski
>>>>>>>> =============
>>>>>>>> CEO of CyberChimps LLC
>>>>>>>> trent at cyberchimps.com
>>>>>>>> Mobile (714) 904-4280
>>>>>>>> Twitter @trentlapinski
>>>>>>>> http://CyberChimps.com <http://cyberchimps.com/>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>> <
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120809/fcd543ea/attachment-0001.htm
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Message: 2
>>>>>> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:45:18 -0500
>>>>>> From: Justin Tadlock <justin at justintadlock.com>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Feature slider default links
>>>>>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> Message-ID: <5023081E.1040307 at justintadlock.com>
>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why not just make the slider work without a link? I assume you're
>>>>>> displaying some sort of image slider and each image is wrapped in a
>>>>>> link. It makes sense to me that if the user doesn't add a link, the
>>>>>> individual slide doesn't need to link anywhere. It gives users an
>>>>>> extra
>>>>>> option if they want to use it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/8/2012 6:54 PM, Trent Lapinski wrote:
>>>>>>> @Chip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I suppose I could but that doesn't really show the custom URL
>>>>>>> functionality.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would rather just get an exception.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --Trent Lapinski
>>>>>>> =============
>>>>>>> CEO of CyberChimps LLC
>>>>>>> trent at cyberchimps.com <mailto:trent at cyberchimps.com>
>>>>>>> Mobile (714) 904-4280
>>>>>>> Twitter @trentlapinski
>>>>>>> http://CyberChimps.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 8, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net
>>>>>>> <mailto:chip at chipbennett.net>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why not have them link to home_url() by default, instead?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Trent Lapinski <
>> trent at cyberchimps.com
>>>>>>>> <mailto:trent at cyberchimps.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some of my themes have feature sliders, and for the default
>> links
>>>>>>>> for those slides I simply link them back to my company website
>> to
>>>>>>>> show users can link the images in the feature slider.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It was recently brought to my attention that this may be a grey
>>>>>>>> area in terms of the guidelines. I spoke to Otto about this at
>>>>>>>> WCSF12, and he said it likely shouldn't be too big of an issue
>>>>>>>> and I should be able to request an exception to keep these
>> links.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With that said, I would like to formally request an exception to
>>>>>>>> have these default links. I can have them direct to theme
>>>>>>>> specific pages perhaps?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --Trent Lapinski
>>>>>>>> =============
>>>>>>>> CEO of CyberChimps LLC
>>>>>>>> trent at cyberchimps.com <mailto:trent at cyberchimps.com>
>>>>>>>> Mobile (714) 904-4280 <tel:%28714%29%20904-4280>
>>>>>>>> Twitter @trentlapinski
>>>>>>>> http://CyberChimps.com <http://cyberchimps.com/>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>> <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>> <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>> <
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120808/991e6d1e/attachment.htm
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 27, Issue 36
>>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120808/92f2b369/attachment.htm>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 27, Issue 39
> ***********************************************
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list