[theme-reviewers] stop replying to "theme-reviewers Digest...."

CONNOR Wayne and Jill wayne at dubbo.org
Thu Aug 9 02:19:07 UTC 2012


Oops!

Thanks,

Wayne

On 09/08/2012, at 12:05 PM, theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org wrote:

> Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
> 	theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 27, Issue 36 (Daniel Fenn)
>   2. Re: theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 27, Issue 36 (Bryan Hadaway)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:01:43 +1000
> From: Daniel Fenn <danielx386 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 27, Issue
> 	36
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAJ5Hi2h6rHfu-2bV1ie8cpydF1UrtcvnEL1QJRBdXKSTSHTb8Q at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> No, what I was saying is that you reply to the topic tread, and not
> the digest emails.
> 
> Regards,
> Daniel Fenn
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Isn't this the very purpose of this email group, to discuss things like
>> this? If you don't have any personal interest or input in a specific email,
>> just ignore the email, right?
>> 
>> 
>> Bryan Phillip Hadaway
>> 
>> 
>> Web & Graphic Designer
>> calmestghost.com
>> bhadaway at gmail.com
>> 
>> 
>> Socialize: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Google+
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Daniel Fenn <danielx386 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Can you please stop replying to "theme-reviewers Digest...." email as
>>> not many of us will read or even answer then?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Daniel Fenn
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:52 AM, CONNOR Wayne and Jill <wayne at dubbo.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> This is the same issue I had with my slidingdoor theme that I made about
>>>> 3 years ago.
>>>> 
>>>> You can see a demo here:
>>>> 
>>>> http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/sliding-door
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Using home_url() doesn't work because it makes the person previewing the
>>>> theme may think that clicking on the sliding menu just returns you to the
>>>> home page. It's not actually obvious that they can be linked somewhere else.
>>>> 
>>>> Let me say it was tempting to put some of my own commercial or personal
>>>> URLs in these links,  because they essentially bypass the link checking of
>>>> the review process. Also these links disappear automatically as soon as the
>>>> end user creates their own pages.
>>>> 
>>>> I decided just to use theme URLs on the links at the time because I
>>>> thought that was the intention of the WordPress guidelines.
>>>> 
>>>> I would think that if they are not a permanent part of the theme (like a
>>>> footer link) then using EITHER (1) wordpress.org or (2) the theme URL or (3)
>>>> the author URL or (4) example.com or (5) home_url() would give enough
>>>> options, but not a different URL.
>>>> 
>>>> If you don't have guidelines you'll get all sorts of jokers linking to
>>>> all sorts of places.
>>>> 
>>>> Wayne
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 09/08/2012, at 10:45 AM, theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
>>>>>      theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>>>      http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>>>      theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>>>      theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>>> than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>> 
>>>>>  1. Re: Feature slider default links (Daniel Tara)
>>>>>  2. Re: Feature slider default links (Justin Tadlock)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> Message: 1
>>>>> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 03:35:57 +0300
>>>>> From: Daniel Tara <contact at onedesigns.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Feature slider default links
>>>>> To: "theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org"
>>>>>      <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>> Message-ID: <6052357002005747691 at unknownmsgid>
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why not link to something like www.example.com? It's generally
>>>>> accepted
>>>>> that's a domain used for demonstration purposes, nobody would question
>>>>> if
>>>>> you'd use that.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 09.08.2012, at 03:33, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> How so? Can you explain how you're attempting to show this custom URL
>>>>> functionality? Perhaps I'm just not following you. Are you talking
>>>>> about a
>>>>> Theme demo? Are you talking about the default custom URLs that appear
>>>>> in
>>>>> the Theme options page? Something else?
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Trent Lapinski
>>>>> <trent at cyberchimps.com>wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> @Chip
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I suppose I could but that doesn't really show the custom URL
>>>>>> functionality.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I would rather just get an exception.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --Trent Lapinski
>>>>>> =============
>>>>>> CEO of CyberChimps LLC
>>>>>> trent at cyberchimps.com
>>>>>> Mobile (714) 904-4280
>>>>>> Twitter @trentlapinski
>>>>>> http://CyberChimps.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Aug 8, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Why not have them link to home_url() by default, instead?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Trent Lapinski
>>>>>> <trent at cyberchimps.com>wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Some of my themes have feature sliders, and for the default links for
>>>>>>> those slides I simply link them back to my company website to show
>>>>>>> users
>>>>>>> can link the images in the feature slider.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It was recently brought to my attention that this may be a grey area
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> terms of the guidelines. I spoke to Otto about this at WCSF12, and he
>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>> it likely shouldn't be too big of an issue and I should be able to
>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>> an exception to keep these links.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> With that said, I would like to formally request an exception to have
>>>>>>> these default links. I can have them direct to theme specific pages
>>>>>>> perhaps?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --Trent Lapinski
>>>>>>> =============
>>>>>>> CEO of CyberChimps LLC
>>>>>>> trent at cyberchimps.com
>>>>>>> Mobile (714) 904-4280
>>>>>>> Twitter @trentlapinski
>>>>>>> http://CyberChimps.com <http://cyberchimps.com/>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>> URL:
>>>>> <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120809/fcd543ea/attachment-0001.htm>
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> Message: 2
>>>>> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:45:18 -0500
>>>>> From: Justin Tadlock <justin at justintadlock.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Feature slider default links
>>>>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> Message-ID: <5023081E.1040307 at justintadlock.com>
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why not just make the slider work without a link?  I assume you're
>>>>> displaying some sort of image slider and each image is wrapped in a
>>>>> link.  It makes sense to me that if the user doesn't add a link, the
>>>>> individual slide doesn't need to link anywhere.  It gives users an
>>>>> extra
>>>>> option if they want to use it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 8/8/2012 6:54 PM, Trent Lapinski wrote:
>>>>>> @Chip
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I suppose I could but that doesn't really show the custom URL
>>>>>> functionality.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I would rather just get an exception.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --Trent Lapinski
>>>>>> =============
>>>>>> CEO of CyberChimps LLC
>>>>>> trent at cyberchimps.com <mailto:trent at cyberchimps.com>
>>>>>> Mobile (714) 904-4280
>>>>>> Twitter @trentlapinski
>>>>>> http://CyberChimps.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Aug 8, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net
>>>>>> <mailto:chip at chipbennett.net>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Why not have them link to home_url() by default, instead?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Trent Lapinski <trent at cyberchimps.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:trent at cyberchimps.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   Hi everyone,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   Some of my themes have feature sliders, and for the default links
>>>>>>>   for those slides I simply link them back to my company website to
>>>>>>>   show users can link the images in the feature slider.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   It was recently brought to my attention that this may be a grey
>>>>>>>   area in terms of the guidelines. I spoke to Otto about this at
>>>>>>>   WCSF12, and he said it likely shouldn't be too big of an issue
>>>>>>>   and I should be able to request an exception to keep these links.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   With that said, I would like to formally request an exception to
>>>>>>>   have these default links. I can have them direct to theme
>>>>>>>   specific pages perhaps?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   --Trent Lapinski
>>>>>>>   =============
>>>>>>>   CEO of CyberChimps LLC
>>>>>>>   trent at cyberchimps.com <mailto:trent at cyberchimps.com>
>>>>>>>   Mobile (714) 904-4280 <tel:%28714%29%20904-4280>
>>>>>>>   Twitter @trentlapinski
>>>>>>>   http://CyberChimps.com <http://cyberchimps.com/>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>   theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>   theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>   <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>>>>   http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>> 
>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>> URL:
>>>>> <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120808/991e6d1e/attachment.htm>
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 27, Issue 36
>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 19:05:49 -0700
> From: Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 27, Issue
> 	36
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAP3jXhRQGEhZ2L-dxWVAYuzCJmUutZNimyTp4OPL2MczJRSgyA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Oh you're referring to:
> 
> http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/
> 
> I don't think everyone is aware of that, so there's the link.
> 
> It's extremely convenient to just comment by email so I wonder if this
> bothers everyone else?
> 
> 
> Bryan Phillip Hadaway
> 
> 
> Web & Graphic Designer
> calmestghost.com
> bhadaway at gmail.com
> 
> 
> *Socialize:* Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/calmestghost> |
> Twitter<http://twitter.com/calmestghost> |
> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/calmestghost> |
> Google+<https://plus.google.com/104582075016689917593>
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Daniel Fenn <danielx386 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> No, what I was saying is that you reply to the topic tread, and not
>> the digest emails.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Daniel Fenn
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Isn't this the very purpose of this email group, to discuss things like
>>> this? If you don't have any personal interest or input in a specific
>> email,
>>> just ignore the email, right?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Bryan Phillip Hadaway
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Web & Graphic Designer
>>> calmestghost.com
>>> bhadaway at gmail.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Socialize: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Google+
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Daniel Fenn <danielx386 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Can you please stop replying to "theme-reviewers Digest...." email as
>>>> not many of us will read or even answer then?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Daniel Fenn
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:52 AM, CONNOR Wayne and Jill <wayne at dubbo.org
>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> This is the same issue I had with my slidingdoor theme that I made
>> about
>>>>> 3 years ago.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You can see a demo here:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/sliding-door
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Using home_url() doesn't work because it makes the person previewing
>> the
>>>>> theme may think that clicking on the sliding menu just returns you to
>> the
>>>>> home page. It's not actually obvious that they can be linked
>> somewhere else.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Let me say it was tempting to put some of my own commercial or
>> personal
>>>>> URLs in these links,  because they essentially bypass the link
>> checking of
>>>>> the review process. Also these links disappear automatically as soon
>> as the
>>>>> end user creates their own pages.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I decided just to use theme URLs on the links at the time because I
>>>>> thought that was the intention of the WordPress guidelines.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would think that if they are not a permanent part of the theme
>> (like a
>>>>> footer link) then using EITHER (1) wordpress.org or (2) the theme
>> URL or (3)
>>>>> the author URL or (4) example.com or (5) home_url() would give enough
>>>>> options, but not a different URL.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you don't have guidelines you'll get all sorts of jokers linking to
>>>>> all sorts of places.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Wayne
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 09/08/2012, at 10:45 AM,
>> theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
>>>>>>      theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>>>>      http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>>>>      theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>>>>      theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>>>> than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  1. Re: Feature slider default links (Daniel Tara)
>>>>>>  2. Re: Feature slider default links (Justin Tadlock)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Message: 1
>>>>>> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 03:35:57 +0300
>>>>>> From: Daniel Tara <contact at onedesigns.com>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Feature slider default links
>>>>>> To: "theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org"
>>>>>>      <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>>> Message-ID: <6052357002005747691 at unknownmsgid>
>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Why not link to something like www.example.com? It's generally
>>>>>> accepted
>>>>>> that's a domain used for demonstration purposes, nobody would
>> question
>>>>>> if
>>>>>> you'd use that.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 09.08.2012, at 03:33, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> How so? Can you explain how you're attempting to show this custom URL
>>>>>> functionality? Perhaps I'm just not following you. Are you talking
>>>>>> about a
>>>>>> Theme demo? Are you talking about the default custom URLs that appear
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the Theme options page? Something else?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Trent Lapinski
>>>>>> <trent at cyberchimps.com>wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> @Chip
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I suppose I could but that doesn't really show the custom URL
>>>>>>> functionality.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I would rather just get an exception.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --Trent Lapinski
>>>>>>> =============
>>>>>>> CEO of CyberChimps LLC
>>>>>>> trent at cyberchimps.com
>>>>>>> Mobile (714) 904-4280
>>>>>>> Twitter @trentlapinski
>>>>>>> http://CyberChimps.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Aug 8, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Why not have them link to home_url() by default, instead?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Trent Lapinski
>>>>>>> <trent at cyberchimps.com>wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Some of my themes have feature sliders, and for the default links
>> for
>>>>>>>> those slides I simply link them back to my company website to show
>>>>>>>> users
>>>>>>>> can link the images in the feature slider.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It was recently brought to my attention that this may be a grey
>> area
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> terms of the guidelines. I spoke to Otto about this at WCSF12, and
>> he
>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>> it likely shouldn't be too big of an issue and I should be able to
>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>> an exception to keep these links.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> With that said, I would like to formally request an exception to
>> have
>>>>>>>> these default links. I can have them direct to theme specific pages
>>>>>>>> perhaps?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --Trent Lapinski
>>>>>>>> =============
>>>>>>>> CEO of CyberChimps LLC
>>>>>>>> trent at cyberchimps.com
>>>>>>>> Mobile (714) 904-4280
>>>>>>>> Twitter @trentlapinski
>>>>>>>> http://CyberChimps.com <http://cyberchimps.com/>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>> <
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120809/fcd543ea/attachment-0001.htm
>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Message: 2
>>>>>> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:45:18 -0500
>>>>>> From: Justin Tadlock <justin at justintadlock.com>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Feature slider default links
>>>>>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> Message-ID: <5023081E.1040307 at justintadlock.com>
>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Why not just make the slider work without a link?  I assume you're
>>>>>> displaying some sort of image slider and each image is wrapped in a
>>>>>> link.  It makes sense to me that if the user doesn't add a link, the
>>>>>> individual slide doesn't need to link anywhere.  It gives users an
>>>>>> extra
>>>>>> option if they want to use it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 8/8/2012 6:54 PM, Trent Lapinski wrote:
>>>>>>> @Chip
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I suppose I could but that doesn't really show the custom URL
>>>>>>> functionality.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I would rather just get an exception.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --Trent Lapinski
>>>>>>> =============
>>>>>>> CEO of CyberChimps LLC
>>>>>>> trent at cyberchimps.com <mailto:trent at cyberchimps.com>
>>>>>>> Mobile (714) 904-4280
>>>>>>> Twitter @trentlapinski
>>>>>>> http://CyberChimps.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Aug 8, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net
>>>>>>> <mailto:chip at chipbennett.net>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Why not have them link to home_url() by default, instead?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Trent Lapinski <
>> trent at cyberchimps.com
>>>>>>>> <mailto:trent at cyberchimps.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>   Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>   Some of my themes have feature sliders, and for the default
>> links
>>>>>>>>   for those slides I simply link them back to my company website
>> to
>>>>>>>>   show users can link the images in the feature slider.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>   It was recently brought to my attention that this may be a grey
>>>>>>>>   area in terms of the guidelines. I spoke to Otto about this at
>>>>>>>>   WCSF12, and he said it likely shouldn't be too big of an issue
>>>>>>>>   and I should be able to request an exception to keep these
>> links.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>   With that said, I would like to formally request an exception to
>>>>>>>>   have these default links. I can have them direct to theme
>>>>>>>>   specific pages perhaps?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>   --Trent Lapinski
>>>>>>>>   =============
>>>>>>>>   CEO of CyberChimps LLC
>>>>>>>>   trent at cyberchimps.com <mailto:trent at cyberchimps.com>
>>>>>>>>   Mobile (714) 904-4280 <tel:%28714%29%20904-4280>
>>>>>>>>   Twitter @trentlapinski
>>>>>>>>   http://CyberChimps.com <http://cyberchimps.com/>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>   _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>   theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>   theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>   <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>>>>>   http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>> <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>> <
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120808/991e6d1e/attachment.htm
>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 27, Issue 36
>>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120808/92f2b369/attachment.htm>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> 
> 
> End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 27, Issue 39
> ***********************************************



More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list