[theme-reviewers] required CSS classes

[Emil Uzelac]

Nicely done! I modified this while back as well
http://codex.wordpress.org/CSS#WordPress_Generated_Classes, fully working
example that covers Theme Unit Data, including the wide images etc.


*----*
*Emil Uzelac* | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac | E:
emil at themeid.com | http://themeid.com
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein



On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:

> Nicely done, Kirk.
>
> We probably should have added something like that before. It's great to
> have a fresher set of eyes looking at things. Thanks.
>
>
> Cais.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
>> Looks good!
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Kirk Wight <kwight at kwight.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> Ah, that makes more sense already. I've added a small note to the Codex<http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#WordPress-Generated_CSS_Classes> for
>>> clarification.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8 October 2011 10:23, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kirk,
>>>>
>>>> They're required because they're added/used by WordPress.
>>>>
>>>> The only ones that are allowed to be "blank" are .sticky and
>>>> .bypostauthor. The intent here is that the Theme developer consider these
>>>> classes in the design intent for the Theme. We consider *not* styling them
>>>> to be valid design intent, but want to have a modicum of assurance that the
>>>> developer has *considered* them.
>>>>
>>>> The others are all required to be styled *appropriately*: .alignleft,
>>>> .alignright, .aligncenter, .wp-caption, .wp-caption-text, .gallery-caption
>>>>
>>>> Hope this helps!
>>>>
>>>> Chip
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Kirk Wight <kwight at kwight.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Can anyone point me to sources explaining the thinking behind the
>>>>> required CSS classes? I'm wondering why these particular classes are
>>>>> required, and why they can be empty when present. I'm sure there must have
>>>>> been extensive discussion at some point, but I've checked the list archives
>>>>> and can't find anything definitive.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Kirk
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20111008/a9683bf0/attachment.htm>