[theme-reviewers] required CSS classes

[Edward Caissie]

Nicely done, Kirk.

We probably should have added something like that before. It's great to have
a fresher set of eyes looking at things. Thanks.


Cais.


On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> Looks good!
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Kirk Wight <kwight at kwight.ca> wrote:
>
>> Ah, that makes more sense already. I've added a small note to the Codex<http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#WordPress-Generated_CSS_Classes> for
>> clarification.
>>
>>
>> On 8 October 2011 10:23, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Kirk,
>>>
>>> They're required because they're added/used by WordPress.
>>>
>>> The only ones that are allowed to be "blank" are .sticky and
>>> .bypostauthor. The intent here is that the Theme developer consider these
>>> classes in the design intent for the Theme. We consider *not* styling them
>>> to be valid design intent, but want to have a modicum of assurance that the
>>> developer has *considered* them.
>>>
>>> The others are all required to be styled *appropriately*: .alignleft,
>>> .alignright, .aligncenter, .wp-caption, .wp-caption-text, .gallery-caption
>>>
>>> Hope this helps!
>>>
>>> Chip
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Kirk Wight <kwight at kwight.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can anyone point me to sources explaining the thinking behind the
>>>> required CSS classes? I'm wondering why these particular classes are
>>>> required, and why they can be empty when present. I'm sure there must have
>>>> been extensive discussion at some point, but I've checked the list archives
>>>> and can't find anything definitive.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Kirk
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20111008/788f9dd6/attachment-0001.htm>