[theme-reviewers] A problem about theme update

[Justice]

Oh, I see. Thanks for clarification and your hard work here :)

Best regards,
Justice

2011/10/8 Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>

> In that case "New" simply refers to the TRAC status, which is either "New",
> "Assigned", "Accepted" (which we don't generally use), and "Closed". So:
>
> "New": unassigned ticket (i.e. waiting in queue)
> "Assigned": ticket currently being reviewed
> "Closed": ticket review completed
>
> Chip
>
> 2011/10/7 Justice <justice360 at gmail.com>
>
>> Thanks. That 'New Theme' on the ticket page is quite misleading.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Justice
>>
>> 在 2011-10-8，上午1:57，Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> 写道：
>>
>> To clarify: in order to be included in the Priority #1 Queue (i.e.
>> Previously Approved Themes), the *most recent version* of the Theme must
>> have been either approved, or closed-newer-version-uploaded. If the most
>> recent version of the Theme was not-approved, then the current version falls
>> into the next priority queue.
>>
>> Chip
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Edward Caissie <<edward.caissie at gmail.com>
>> edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The last Trac ticket was approximately 2 months ago and at that time it
>>> was marked as "not-approved"; this moved the theme into the next queue down
>>> in priority.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cais.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Justice < <justice360 at gmail.com>
>>> justice360 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I uploaded a newer version of theme *SimpleDark* recently but I found the
>>>> trac ticket <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/5538> is
>>>> categorized into "*previously reviewed themes*"(the ticket shows it's a
>>>> new theme), not "*previously approved themes*" as it used to be. I
>>>> don't know if there is something wrong or it just worked as expected now.
>>>> Could anyone please have a look at that?
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> Justice
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>  <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>  <http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>  <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>  <http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20111008/6fc774c2/attachment.htm>