[theme-reviewers] Some questions about theme translation
Justice
justice360 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 17 03:02:53 UTC 2011
My original intention is for those return values from AJAX requests. For
example, when I submit an empty comment, I'll get the error message "Error:
please type a comment". It's from the core pot file. When I submit the same
empty comment via AJAX, I may expect that same error message. If I always
use the theme translation, once the core translation change, they'll be
inconsistent. But if the original string changes, the inconsistency will be
inevitable. I think there's no perfect sollution because WordPress is just
not designed to work with AJAX.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Dion Hulse (dd32) <wordpress at dd32.id.au>wrote:
> That's a lot of extra work for little benefit.
>
> Just include the string as a translatable item in your pot file, that way
> your users will always get a translated string if it exists for them.
>
> What you suggested was basically "Use cores translated text, otherwise use
> my translated text, otherwise, use the english text" seems if anything,
> you'd want to do theme > core > english.
>
> D
>
> 2011/11/17 Justice <justice360 at gmail.com>
>
>> That makes sense. Thanks.
>> I have another idea to deal with this situation: I can check if the core
>> language pack provides a non-empty translation that is different to the
>> original string and if not, the translation will fallback to that from the
>> theme text domain. Is that feasible?
>>
>> Justice
>>
>> 在 2011-11-16,下午11:08,Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> 写道:
>>
>> I don't think using "twentyten" or "twentyeleven" text strings will
>> *ever* work, because if a different Theme is active, then *that Theme's*
>> textdomain will be loaded, and the twentyten/twentyeleven textdomains will
>> NOT be loaded.
>>
>> On the question of core: there is no guarantee that the core text strings
>> will never change. If the strings are provided by your Theme, then *your
>> Theme* needs to provide the translation for those strings.
>>
>> Chip
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Although I may not be well versed in i18n implementation, the correct
>>> method for a theme in the repository to support it is to have all text
>>> strings visible to the end-user be translatable via the theme's language
>>> files thus requiring the textdomain to be included with each instance where
>>> an i18n function is used ... even if the code is directly copied and pasted
>>> from core.
>>>
>>> One cannot assume the text strings being translated will always be
>>> available as expected if they are not included with the Theme itself. As
>>> with the examples of using the `twentyten` or `twentyeleven` domains, the
>>> theme author cannot expect they will always be available as it is possible
>>> some end-users may choose to remove all themes except for their active one.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cais.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Rick Anderson <rick at byobwebsite.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm interested in this as well. I recently reviewed a theme that had
>>>> some missing text domains, some were using twentyten and others were using
>>>> twentyeleven. I read the section where themes are "required" to provide
>>>> their theme slug as the text domain.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Justice <justice360 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I reused some WordPress core code for AJAX support in my theme so
>>>>> there are some missing text domains when outputing traslatable strings. One
>>>>> reviewer told me that it is required to provide translation in my own
>>>>> language pack for all translatable strings appear in my theme. Actually I
>>>>> left that blank by intention because I'd like to use the same wording as
>>>>> the core language packs of WordPress, eg. Name, Email, Error: please type a
>>>>> comment, etc.
>>>>> Can anybody tell me why themes can't share the core language pack?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for hard working!
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Justice
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Rick Anderson*
>>>> *WordPress Trainer/Web Developer*
>>>> www.byobwebsite.com
>>>> 935 Daley Street
>>>> Edmonds, WA 98020
>>>> (206) 801-5209
>>>> Skype - tailoringtheweb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20111117/03ceb3fc/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list