[theme-reviewers] Proposed WordPress 3.3 Theme Review Guidelines Revisions
Simon Prosser
pross at pross.org.uk
Thu Nov 10 21:08:53 UTC 2011
http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2011/10/06/translating-wordpress-plugins-and-themes-dont-get-clever/
On 10 November 2011 21:02, Tyler Cunningham <seizedpropaganda at gmail.com>wrote:
> I have a question regarding one of the items on the list:
>
>
> - Internationalization:
> - Themes are REQUIRED to use a string, rather than a variable,
> constant, or concatenation, as the textdomain in translation functions.
>
> Why should this be required? By using a variable someone can very easily
> change the text domain as needed wether it be for a child or derivative
> theme. I really don't see the reasoning behind this one, so could someone
> please enlighten me?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tyler Cunningham | Founder, COO - CyberChimps LLC<http://CyberChimps.com/>
>
> @tylerbcunning <http://twitter.com/tylerbcunning>
> http://gplus.to/tylercunningham
> http://linkedin.com/in/tylerbcunningham
> tyler at cyberchimps.com
>
> On Thursday, November 10, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
>
> Maybe the word FORBIDDEN could be used instead if it makes it clearer.
>
> On 11/10/2011 10:24 AM, Mario Peshev wrote:
>
> Please do apologize my English, but as a foreign language 'REQUIRED
> NOT to' written this way looks exactly like "NOT REQUIRED to'" (with
> this exact casing).
>
> Could be my bad, but these are guidelines and the cleaner, the better.
>
> Mario Peshev
> Training and Consulting Services @ DevriX
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/mpeshev
> http://devrix.com
> http://peshev.net/blog
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> wrote:
>
> Good morning, Theme developers and reviewers!
> Now is the time to begin discussing and finalizing the changes to the Theme
> Review Guidelines pursuant to the release of WordPress 3.3. Please read and
> discuss, here:
>
> http://make.wordpress.org/themes/2011/11/10/wordpress-3-3-proposed-guidelines-revisions/
> Note that, until WordPress 3.3 is released, these proposed revisions are a
> work-in-progress. Consider the above link as a "Request For Comment"; if
> you
> have anything to add, or disagree with anything proposed, please comment
> accordingly. We post these, because we value your input and feedback as
> Theme developers.
> Thanks!
> Chip
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
--
My Blog: http://pross.org.uk/
Plugins : http://pross.org.uk/plugins/
Themes: http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/profile/pross
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20111110/a54b76b0/attachment.htm>
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list