[theme-reviewers] Proposed WordPress 3.3 Theme Review Guidelines Revisions

Tony Crockford tonyc at boldfish.co.uk
Thu Nov 10 16:14:17 UTC 2011

On Thu Nov 10 2011 16:06:53 Mario Peshev wrote:
> For me - yes. Just not quite sure if it is 100% English-acceptable
> "REQUIRED to NOT", if so, than discussion is over for me.

To me it feels more of a comfortable English usage, making it clear what you are required to not do, if that construction makes more sense to non-English speakers than it would ultimately be clearer?

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list