[theme-reviewers] Proposed WordPress 3.3 Theme Review Guidelines Revisions
chip at chipbennett.net
Thu Nov 10 15:27:28 UTC 2011
The intent is to indicate "required NOT to" do something. What is your
suggested phrasing, to ensure intent isn't lost in translation? :)
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Mario Peshev <mario at peshev.net> wrote:
> Please do apologize my English, but as a foreign language 'REQUIRED
> NOT to' written this way looks exactly like "NOT REQUIRED to'" (with
> this exact casing).
> Could be my bad, but these are guidelines and the cleaner, the better.
> Mario Peshev
> Training and Consulting Services @ DevriX
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> > Good morning, Theme developers and reviewers!
> > Now is the time to begin discussing and finalizing the changes to the
> > Review Guidelines pursuant to the release of WordPress 3.3. Please read
> > discuss, here:
> > Note that, until WordPress 3.3 is released, these proposed revisions are
> > work-in-progress. Consider the above link as a "Request For Comment"; if
> > have anything to add, or disagree with anything proposed, please comment
> > accordingly. We post these, because we value your input and feedback as
> > Theme developers.
> > Thanks!
> > Chip
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the theme-reviewers