[theme-reviewers] Question about footer credit function

Angelo Bertolli angelo.bertolli at gmail.com
Fri Nov 4 05:51:58 UTC 2011


I agree.  Obfuscating code is definitely against the spirit of the theme
repository.

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com> wrote:

> That base64 should be enough to FAIL immediately.
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Tyler Cunningham
> <seizedpropaganda at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hey all,
> > Finally had some time to sit down and do some reviews so I was clearing
> out
> > some of the priority 1 tickets and came across something I wanted to run
> by
> > some of the more senior review members. Check out the following diff:
> >
> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?old_path=/naturefox/1.0.5&new_path=/naturefox/1.0.6#file8
> > As soon as I saw the naturefox_credits function a red flag came up.
> Should I
> > ask the author what the purpose behind this is? Is this a no-no?
> > Thanks.
> > Regards,
> >
> > Tyler Cunningham  |  Founder, COO - CyberChimps LLC
> > @tylerbcunning
> > http://gplus.to/tylercunningham
> > http://linkedin.com/in/tylerbcunningham
> > tyler at cyberchimps.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -Doug
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20111104/f73fdc72/attachment.htm>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list