[theme-reviewers] Trac not synching with Extend?

[Edward Caissie]

I just completely brought it into sync in less than an hour ... not so sure
where the issues are if from what I am reading it was almost two weeks out
of sync.


Cais.

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> I disagree that the current workflow is efficient or feasibly able to be
> maintained. This might make a good agenda item for our upcoming meeting.
>
> Chip
>
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> The current workflow works, as long as it is attended to every day ...
>> unfortunately I have been very busy with other projects to keep it within
>> the maximum 24 hour turn-around I expected/maintained.
>>
>> As my plans to day have been completely blown out of the water, I'll go in
>> and make sure everything is back in sync (approved, not-approved, etc.)
>>
>>
>> Cais.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>
>>> Synching is not only a manual process, it is a rather tedious manual
>>> process. Extend has no knowledge of a given ticket's resolution, and we
>>> currently have no way in Trac of queueing tickets that require resolution.
>>>
>>> I have an idea, that we can try. It may or may not work, but it's worth a
>>> shot.
>>>
>>> REVIEWERS: when you close a ticket as APPROVED, add the following keyword
>>> to the ticket: "syncapproved". That way, we can add a Trac report around
>>> this keyword, and won't have to search for approved Themes that need to be
>>> synced. This way, whomever does the sync can just remove the keyword from
>>> the ticket.
>>>
>>> (If you want to be extra helpful, for tickets closed as not-approved or
>>> newer-version-uploaded, add this keyword to the ticket: "synchold". But
>>> getting the *approved* Themes synced as quickly as possible is far more
>>> important than syncing *old* (i.e. not-approved or newer-version-uploaded)
>>> tickets.)
>>>
>>> After having helped with the Trac-Extend sync for a few weeks now, I'm
>>> fairly convinced that this method would be more efficient than the current
>>> workflow.
>>>
>>> Chip
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Daniel Tara <contact at onedesigns.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Is there anything wrong with the synch operation?
>>>> > Otto, do you know anything about this?
>>>>
>>>> There is no sync operation, all the themes have to be approved
>>>> manually by the mods of the theme system, which is basically Chip,
>>>> Pross, Cais, and Emil.
>>>>
>>>> -Otto
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110523/25d287ca/attachment-0001.htm>