[theme-reviewers] Please assign me a theme to review

[Chip Bennett]

Sorry, I should have included "how the Theme is intended to work" along with
"how to set up the Theme".

I've not looked at the Theme (and don't currently have time), so I'm
speaking only in generalizations; that said, our normal practice is that,
for any abnormal/unexpected design/functionality intent, that intent should
be explained in the Theme documentation. Without having seen the Theme,
based on your description I would think that the navigation would fall into
that classification, and that Theme documentation explaining its usage would
suffice.

Chip

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> wrote:
> > Does the Theme provide documentation - e.g. a readme.txt or a Admin Help
> > page or contextual help - to explain how to set up the Theme properly?
> > Chip
>
> No, but then there's nothing really to "set up" about the theme. You
> make posts, they appear where they appear. That's pretty much that.
>
> The pagination argument is valid, but ultimately a design decision.
> They should indeed have pagination using the normal means (they
> don't), but that doesn't mean they have to have it *everywhere*. I can
> see valid use cases for not having pagination on the home page and
> wanting people to click through to archive links instead. Given the
> custom archive linking scheme, that sorta makes sense here.
>
> -Otto
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110329/c03fad56/attachment.htm>