[theme-reviewers] Why the bias.

Chip Bennett chip at chipbennett.net
Tue Feb 15 16:22:40 UTC 2011

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Satish Gandham <satish.iitg at gmail.com>wrote:

> Wordpress $content_width doesn't work for external images, but javaScript
> does.
> *yours is not the world's most important issue.*
> yes, mine is not the worlds most important issue. But there are other
> places to discuss worlds important issues, and this is definitely not one of
> them.
> Ok, you are saying
>    1. Using their logo for site name is not a big issue, and overlooked or
>    its acceptable.
>    2. And the reviewer missed the invisible post content while reviewing.
> My theme gets special attention, and nothing is overlooked.

Again, in case you missed it in my previous response:

P.S. <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/2927#comment:3>

P.P.S <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/2927#comment:4>.

It was overlooked. I went back and verified, and updated the comments.
Thanks for bringing it to our attention.

> Thanks for the special attention given to my theme, this really saves me a
> lot of time and helps me find problems which i wouldnt find myself (Because,
> they are hard to find, or doesn't exist for real world cases)
> I only wish the special attention isnt motivated by the grudge against me
> or my theme.
> ...a claim that remains specious.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110215/eb755143/attachment.htm>

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list