[theme-reviewers] theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 11, Issue 56

[Edward Caissie]

@Doug - Then both version should be marked as "not-approved" :-(
Just make sure the most recent has a reasonably thorough review done.

It is a rare case when a reviewer will be looking at a Theme and a new
version is uploaded at the same time.


Cais.

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
> > We generally leave that to the reviewers to check for and handle.
> > There's no good automatic way to implement it at the moment.
> >
> > Ideally, when somebody uploads a new version and their old one hasn't
> > been closed yet, they would go add a comment with a link to the newer
> > version. Then, the reviewer, upon seeing that comment, would close the
> > ticket with the newer-version flag, then go review the new version
> > instead. This has the effect of keeping the person's place the queue
> > despite uploading newer versions.
> >
> > -Otto
> >
>
> So then how do we handle instances like this, where the older version
> and newer version are being reviewed by two separate people?
>
> I've downloaded and run a quick test on version 1.3 of this theme and
> it seems as if all of my original critiques are still valid (and
> actually a few more Theme Check inconsistencies have crept in as
> well...)
>
>
> --
> -Doug
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110418/b1b5952f/attachment.htm>