[theme-reviewers] theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 11, Issue 56
Doug Stewart
zamoose at gmail.com
Mon Apr 18 13:16:53 UTC 2011
Cais:
That ticket was slung my way, IIRC, and I tried to add my review but
wasn't able -- no permissions.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Edward Caissie
<edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
> @Tammie - Here is a BP ticket: http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/3546
>
> The review process is slightly different for BP themes at times but thanks
> for taking this on!
>
>
> Cais.
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Tammie Lister <tlister at logicalbinary.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, thought about time I poked my head up and got involved too. My
>> username is karmatosed on WordPress.
>> I'll put myself forward for any BuddyPress ones but can also do WordPress
>> ones if required. Don't know but sounds like you've got a bit of a backlog
>> on BuddyPress ones? I'm a theme designer who does both BuddyPress and pure
>> WordPress themes.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tammie Lister
>>
>> On Monday, 18 April 2011 at 04:35,
>> theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org wrote:
>>
>> Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: Join the team (Emil Uzelac)
>> 2. BuddyPress themes? (Doug Stewart)
>> 3. Re: BuddyPress themes? (Emil Uzelac)
>> 4. Please assign a theme from the Theme Review Trac Queue for
>> username smgrundy at live.com (Shawn Grundy)
>> 5. Where can I learn more about theme security (myazalea at hotmail.com)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 21:04:54 -0500
>> From: Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com>
>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Join the team
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> Message-ID: <BANLkTi=N5TzbQh2C81-2pBr=7jSoF4kQHg at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> menu is OK, widgetized menu is OK too ;)
>> *----*
>> *Emil Uzelac* | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac | E:
>> emil at themeid.com | http://themeid.com
>> Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I actually disagree regarding the "Menu" Widget - maybe. :)
>>
>> If the Theme simply provides a Widgetized sidebar, and no "Navigation
>> Menu"
>> markup, then this approach is fine. However, if the Theme has what would
>> reasonably considered to be the design intent of a Navigation Menu, then
>> that implementation must support the core Nav Menu feature.
>>
>> Basically: Themes are not *required* to provide Navigation Menus, but if
>> they *do* provide a Navigation Menu, then it must support the core
>> functionality.
>>
>> Chip
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:
>>
>> 1. The theme uses the text domain of Twenty Ten in a few spots. If I
>> remember correctly from lurking on the list this is a reason for failure
>> of
>> the theme.
>> *Yes, Twenty Ten should be changed to i.e. silverville*
>> **
>> 2. They use a widget for the menu and instruct the user to add the Pages
>> widget. It seems to me that it's a much better option to use a WordPress
>> menu which defaults to list pages. I don't believe this is an issue for a
>> fail but probably a good suggestion as an update to the user.
>> *This part is just fine. As long as there are options for menu and being
>> fully functional.*
>> **
>> 3. The CSS fails on the background-color since it's value is set to 'none'
>> when it should be set to 'transparent'. Would this typically be a reason
>> for
>> failure if all other CSS is okay?
>> *background-color: none; is invalid and it should be transparent.
>> Recommendation would be background: none; or background-image: none; and
>> not
>> many people use the last one anymore. It's shortcoded via background.*
>> **
>> 4. There are a number of other 'recommended' items in Theme Check but
>> these are not a reason to fail a theme correct?
>> *Recommended isn't required, if recommendations don't cause problems, no
>> need to fail.
>> *
>> Emil
>> **
>> *----*
>> *Emil Uzelac* | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac | E:
>> emil at themeid.com | http://themeid.com
>> Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert
>> Einstein
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Curtis McHale
>> <curtis at curtismchale.ca>wrote:
>>
>> I have a few questions about my first theme review.
>>
>> 1. The theme uses the text domain of Twenty Ten in a few spots. If I
>> remember correctly from lurking on the list this is a reason for failure
>> of
>> the theme.
>> 2. They use a widget for the menu and instruct the user to add the Pages
>> widget. It seems to me that it's a much better option to use a WordPress
>> menu which defaults to list pages. I don't believe this is an issue for a
>> fail but probably a good suggestion as an update to the user.
>> 3. The CSS fails on the background-color since it's value is set to
>> 'none' when it should be set to 'transparent'. Would this typically be a
>> reason for failure if all other CSS is okay?
>> 4. There are a number of other 'recommended' items in Theme Check but
>> these are not a reason to fail a theme correct?
>>
>> I could probably go further in to the theme but I wanted to double check
>> on the text domain item before I did.
>>
>> Curtis McHale
>> PH: 604.751.3482
>> http://www.curtismchale.ca
>> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale
>> Twitter: twitter.com/curtismchale
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Edward Caissie <
>> edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Here ya go: http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/3320
>> This will get you started ...
>>
>>
>> Cais.
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Curtis McHale
>> <curtis at curtismchale.ca>wrote:
>>
>> Figured I'd finally get off my butt and join the team after looking at
>> the list for a few months. My trac name is curtismchale
>>
>> Curtis McHale
>> PH: 604.751.3482
>> http://www.curtismchale.ca
>> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale
>> Twitter: twitter.com/curtismchale
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110417/2bfcde18/attachment-0001.htm>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 23:17:51 -0400
>> From: Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com>
>> Subject: [theme-reviewers] BuddyPress themes?
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> Message-ID: <BANLkTinFHy-X_z-MT4PUnfDQQ8js95o9fQ at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> Just how far behind is the BP review queue? I've been doing some BP
>> work and might be able to take a look.
>>
>> Username is ZaMoose.
>>
>> --
>> -Doug
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 22:21:58 -0500
>> From: Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com>
>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] BuddyPress themes?
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> Message-ID: <BANLkTik3+SrXTKZPqPw48A7iec6=g-_05w at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> one in queue and thanks http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/3515
>> *----*
>> *Emil Uzelac* | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac | E:
>> emil at themeid.com | http://themeid.com
>> Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Just how far behind is the BP review queue? I've been doing some BP
>> work and might be able to take a look.
>>
>> Username is ZaMoose.
>>
>> --
>> -Doug
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110417/ad26ab56/attachment-0001.htm>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 20:26:43 -0700
>> From: Shawn Grundy <smgrundy at live.com>
>> Subject: [theme-reviewers] Please assign a theme from the Theme Review
>> Trac Queue for username smgrundy at live.com
>> To: <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> Message-ID: <COL102-W52B1D6E3D4B364C1BE079AE910 at phx.gbl>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>>
>> Please assign a theme from the Theme Review Trac Queue for username
>> smgrundy at live.com
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110417/0a9a1abf/attachment-0001.htm>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 05:34:21 +0200
>> From: myazalea at hotmail.com <myazalea at hotmail.com>
>> Subject: [theme-reviewers] Where can I learn more about theme security
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP68A5A194041773133A3E93C9910 at phx.gbl>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> As the title sais.
>> Are there any mustreads, and what sources are reliable. There isnt alot on
>> this on Wordpress.org or i missed it.
>>
>> or should I just learn more php?
>>
>>
>> Skickat fr?n min HTC
>>
>> ----- Reply message -----
>> Fr?n: "Emil Uzelac" <emil at themeid.com>
>> Till: <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> Rubrik: [theme-reviewers] Join the team
>> Datum: m?n, apr 18, 2011 04:04
>> menu is OK, widgetized menu is OK too ;)----Emil Uzelac | ThemeID | T:
>> 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac | E: emil at themeid.com |
>> http://themeid.com
>>
>>
>> Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I actually disagree regarding the "Menu" Widget - maybe. :)
>> If the Theme simply provides a Widgetized sidebar, and no "Navigation
>> Menu" markup, then this approach is fine. However, if the Theme has what
>> would reasonably considered to be the design intent of a Navigation Menu,
>> then that implementation must support the core Nav Menu feature.
>>
>>
>>
>> Basically: Themes are not *required* to provide Navigation Menus, but if
>> they *do* provide a Navigation Menu, then it must support the core
>> functionality.
>> Chip
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. The theme uses the text domain of Twenty Ten in a few spots. If I
>> remember correctly from lurking on the list this is a reason for failure of
>> the theme.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, Twenty Ten should be changed to i.e. silverville?2. They use a widget
>> for the menu and instruct the user to add the Pages widget. It seems to me
>> that it's a much better option to use a WordPress menu which defaults to
>> list pages. I don't believe this is an issue for a fail but probably a good
>> suggestion as an update to the user.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This part is just fine. As long as there are options for menu and being
>> fully functional.?
>> 3. The CSS fails on the background-color since it's value is set to 'none'
>> when it should be set to 'transparent'. Would this typically be a reason for
>> failure if all other CSS is okay?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> background-color: none; is invalid and it should be transparent.
>> Recommendation would be background: none; or background-image: none; and not
>> many people use the last one anymore. It's shortcoded via background.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ?4. There are a number of other 'recommended' items in Theme Check but
>> these are not a reason to fail a theme correct?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Recommended isn't required, if recommendations don't cause? problems, no
>> need to fail.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Emil?----Emil Uzelac | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac |
>> E: emil at themeid.com | http://themeid.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Curtis McHale <curtis at curtismchale.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a few questions about my first theme review.
>> 1. The theme uses the text domain of Twenty Ten in a few spots. If I
>> remember correctly from lurking on the list this is a reason for failure of
>> the theme..
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2. They use a widget for the menu and instruct the user to add the Pages
>> widget. It seems to me that it's a much better option to use a WordPress
>> menu which defaults to list pages. I don't believe this is an issue for a
>> fail but probably a good suggestion as an update to the user.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 3. The CSS fails on the background-color since it's value is set to 'none'
>> when it should be set to 'transparent'. Would this typically be a reason for
>> failure if all other CSS is okay?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 4. There are a number of other 'recommended' items in Theme Check but
>> these are not a reason to fail a theme correct?
>> I could probably go further in to the theme but I wanted to double check
>> on the text domain item before I did.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Curtis McHale
>> PH: 604.751.3482
>> http://www.curtismchale.ca
>> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Twitter: twitter.com/curtismchale
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Here ya go: http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/3320
>> This will get you started ...
>>
>>
>> Cais.
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Curtis McHale <curtis at curtismchale.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Figured I'd finally get off my butt and join the team after looking at the
>> list for a few months. My trac name is curtismchale
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Curtis McHale
>> PH: 604.751.3482
>> http://www.curtismchale.ca
>>
>>
>> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale
>> Twitter: twitter.com/curtismchale
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110418/9da3f35c/attachment.htm>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>> End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 11, Issue 56
>> ***********************************************
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
--
-Doug
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list