[theme-reviewers] What is wrong with you people? YourejectedTarski?

[Chris Olbekson]

Phil,

Great job and thanks for taking the initiative.  I'm sure tarski users will
be happy to know the theme will now conform to the latest WordPress
conventions.




[image: C3MDigital.com] <http://c3mdigital.com>
[image: Facebook] <http://facebook.com/c3mdigital> [image:
LinkedIn]<http://www.linkedin.com/in/olbekson> [image:
Google] <http://www.google.com/profiles/c3mdigital> [image:
Twitter]<http://twitter.com/chris_olbekson> [image:
Flickr] <http://flickr.com/photos/chris_olbekson> [image:
WordPress]<http://wordpress.org/support/profile/3629249>


On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <
philip at frumph.net> wrote:

> Just an FYI on tarski theme, the github current version 2.7.1 has those
> deprecated and notices fixed as requested.
>
> It appears that the developer just hasn't uploaded the latest version to
> the repository.
>
> Everything else is pretty much 'recommended' more or less anyways.
>
> Although I setup my own github fork of it at
> http://github.com/Frumph/tarski/commits/master modifying it to upgrade it
> to the latest wordpress revision.
>
> That was what, an hour?  Still need to do the comment_form() stuff but
> thats about it to make it up to date with theme review/code standards of
> wordpress 3.0, i'll offer it up to the dev to see if he wants it when i'm
> done.
>
> - Phil
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100924/2d4d5c30/attachment.htm>