[theme-reviewers] What is wrong with you people? You rejected Tarski?
yulian yordanov
yul.yordanov at gmail.com
Fri Sep 24 12:54:55 UTC 2010
Demetris, are you the author of 'Tarsky'? I just like to know whom I
write(answer) to.
Yulian <Fingli>
On 24.9.2010 15:37, Demetris Kikizas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Chip Bennett<chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>> First: eliminate the use of the term "reject". It is inaccurate and
>> needlessly inflammatory. We're not "rejecting" anything. We're simply
>> pointing out things that need to be fixed before *approving* something.
>> We've been over this before.
>> Secondly, I second what Phil has said.
>> We've been told to self-direct the Theme Review process, and we have done
>> so. At this point, I *expect* to be supported by those who have told us to
>> self-direct.
>> We have defined the guidelines; they are good guidelines. You and others
>> appear to have wholesale disagreement with the guidelines (or, at least
>> parts - such as PHP notices and deprecated functions), and at this point, I
>> couldn't care less. Such disagreement is noise and a distraction.
> Unless you first arrived to earth this morning, guidelines that
> exclude Tarski on multiple grounds are not good guidelines.
>
> You people are clueless. I hope someone gives you all the boot and
> shuts this absurd thing down before it is too late.
>
> Demetris,
> http://op111.net/
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
--
Юлиян Йорданов
Yulian Yordanov
http://post-scriptum.info/
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list