[theme-reviewers] What is wrong with you people? You rejectedTarski?

Demetris Kikizas kikizas at gmail.com
Fri Sep 24 12:37:24 UTC 2010

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
> First: eliminate the use of the term "reject". It is inaccurate and
> needlessly inflammatory. We're not "rejecting" anything. We're simply
> pointing out things that need to be fixed before *approving* something.
> We've been over this before.
> Secondly, I second what Phil has said.
> We've been told to self-direct the Theme Review process, and we have done
> so. At this point, I *expect* to be supported by those who have told us to
> self-direct.
> We have defined the guidelines; they are good guidelines. You and others
> appear to have wholesale disagreement with the guidelines (or, at least
> parts - such as PHP notices and deprecated functions), and at this point, I
> couldn't care less. Such disagreement is noise and a distraction.

Unless you first arrived to earth this morning, guidelines that
exclude Tarski on multiple grounds are not good guidelines.

You people are clueless.  I hope someone gives you all the boot and
shuts this absurd thing down before it is too late.


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list