[theme-reviewers] Functions.php Worm

[Jeremy Clark]

It might be more work but there will also be less of it... ie less tickets
to spread between reviewers.

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Edward Caissie
<edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:

> ... at least we would be able to hit the ground running, rather than
> getting tangled up as we have in the past with minimal requirements not
> being met.
>
> It may be more "work" but I still believe it would be an absolute boon to
> the process!
>
>
> Cais.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Marty Martin <m at seoserpent.com> wrote:
>
>> LOL... #dammit
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Simon Prosser <pross at pross.org.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>> > The new uploader *should* take up the slack and stop a lot of the crap
>>> > getting through, well that's what im hoping for.
>>>
>>> Interesting conundrum here. If the uploader actually did prevent bad
>>> code getting through (assume it's magically perfect and checks for all
>>> required stuff as well as preventing all bad stuff getting through),
>>> then that actually increases the workload on the reviewers. Why?
>>> Because now there's no longer any obvious things for a reviewer to
>>> check for to bounce themes back quickly. Theme authors getting
>>> rejected by the theme uploader are more likely to fix their themes and
>>> try again. So every theme making it through would have to be fully
>>> checked, as all requirements would be met. ;-)
>>>
>>> -Otto
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20101013/cac01486/attachment-0001.htm>