[theme-reviewers] Functions.php Worm

[Edward Caissie]

... at least we would be able to hit the ground running, rather than getting
tangled up as we have in the past with minimal requirements not being met.

It may be more "work" but I still believe it would be an absolute boon to
the process!


Cais.

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Marty Martin <m at seoserpent.com> wrote:

> LOL... #dammit
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Simon Prosser <pross at pross.org.uk>
>> wrote:
>> > The new uploader *should* take up the slack and stop a lot of the crap
>> > getting through, well that's what im hoping for.
>>
>> Interesting conundrum here. If the uploader actually did prevent bad
>> code getting through (assume it's magically perfect and checks for all
>> required stuff as well as preventing all bad stuff getting through),
>> then that actually increases the workload on the reviewers. Why?
>> Because now there's no longer any obvious things for a reviewer to
>> check for to bounce themes back quickly. Theme authors getting
>> rejected by the theme uploader are more likely to fix their themes and
>> try again. So every theme making it through would have to be fully
>> checked, as all requirements would be met. ;-)
>>
>> -Otto
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20101013/637f82a1/attachment.htm>