[theme-reviewers] question about first theme review (in progress)

[Chip Bennett]

I would agree: the Guidelines require that the Theme correctly indicate its
license, which this one does.

I would pass a comment to the author recommending the original copyright
notice (TwentyTen) be retained, and an additional notice added for the
author, for the modified work - but it's not a cause for failing the review.

Chip

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Andrew Nacin <wp at andrewnacin.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Marty Martin <m at seoserpent.com> wrote:
>
>> The theme I am reviewing has re-used many of the Twenty Ten theme template
>> files.  I assume this is okay because it's GPL2, but my real question is,
>> should the header at the top of the template file keep the Twenty Ten
>> attributes or should the theme author change it to reflect their own?
>
>
> It should be changed to reflect their own. Specifically, @package should be
> their theme name, not "WordPress." @subpackage can be used however they
> wish, or omitted.
>
> That said, incorrect documentation shouldn't be cause for rejection. Just a
> note passed along to the author.
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20101011/c3f85ca4/attachment-0001.htm>