[theme-reviewers] Featured Themes Questions

[Edward Caissie]

I thought as much for the status "accepted" ... and, yes, when you get a
moment let's change the "not-accepted" resolution to "not-approved" it may
also improve the connotative meaning being associated to the ticket
resolutions as well.

Perhaps that will help when explaining it to those not understanding the
Trac status details.

Thanks,


Cais.

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Edward Caissie <
> edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> This is Trac related, it seems the "accepted" status is causing
> confusion
> >> for some of the Theme authors, is it possible to remove that "option" or
> >> make it unavailable? The core review team does not use it and it seems
> to be
> >> confusing some of the "new" reviewers as well, there are enough
> resolution
> >> options AFAIK that satisfy most if not all our current concerns and
> could
> >> easily be used instead of the misleading "accepted" status.
> >
> > I don't see any "accepted" status. To what are you referring?
>
> Oh, I get it. You mean the accepted for when a user assigns it to
> themselves.
>
> Short answer is no, that is built into trac. It means it's been
> accepted by a person to review. The "Owned by" gets set, basically.
>
> I would suggest changing the "not-accepted" to something else, like
> "not approved", to avoid confusion.
>
> -Otto
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20101001/ffdce87b/attachment.htm>