[theme-reviewers] Post formats

[Edward Caissie]

I agree we need to get to work on 3.1 related Theme Review guidelines and
changes to some of the individual items, but from the "master list" link
below I am only really seeing a few items that need to be immediately
addressed with the release of 3.1:

   - Post Formats <http://codex.wordpress.org/Post_Formats>
14746<http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/14746>
   - Custom post Type Index Pages
13818<http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/13818>
   - Admin Bar 14772 <http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/14772>

I re-ordered them in the priority I see as related to the Theme Review
guidelines.


Cais.

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> By the way: WP 3.1 beta is scheduled for November 15th<http://wpdevel.wordpress.com/version-3-1-project-schedule/>,
> so we really need to hit version-specific changes hard in our next meeting.
>
> Chip
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> By the way, here's the master list of major 3.1 changes<http://codex.wordpress.org/Version_3.1>.
>> Anything else in there we should be considering?
>>
>> As for other Guidelines changes for 3.1, I would add the following
>> proposals:
>>
>> 1) Everything currently marked as "draft" in the Guidelines
>> 2) Use of "License"/"License URI" header tags increases in criticality
>> from *recommended* to *required*
>> 3) Use of TimThumb prohibited (*required* not to use, even for backward
>> compatibility). If we go this route, I will volunteer to put together a
>> tutorial for how to migrate TimThumb-generated images using custom fields
>> over to the WordPress media manager.
>>
>> Additional changes to the Theme Review Codex page:
>>
>> 1) Once we are up and running on our WPORG site, I propose that we move
>> all non-Guideline information (e.g. Process, Scope, How to Become a Theme
>> Reviewer) over to the WPORG site. (Perhaps leave the "Resources" section, as
>> it has links to various Theme check/validation tools.)
>> 2) Re-write the Guidelines so that we have a condensed list of the
>> Guidelines in principle, with intra-page links to expanded/detailed
>> information about each Guideline (as per the mail-list discussion from a
>> couple weeks ago).
>>
>> Anything else?
>>
>> Just as an FYI: WP 3.1 is scheduled for a December release, so we need to
>> get any version-specific Guidelines revisions up as soon as possible. I
>> would want to shoot for having the version-specific changes published at or
>> around the time of the first beta release of 3.1.
>>
>> Chip
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20101111/045ed1b4/attachment.htm>