[theme-reviewers] Priority for themes supporting 3.0 features?

[Edward Caissie]

>
> If you check all 3 new features: custom-header, custom-background,
> custom-menu 0 results.
>

IIRC, the theme authors need to add those tags to their header block(s) for
them to be found.


Cais.

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Chris Olbekson <chris at c3mdigital.com> wrote:

> The Themes Directory is lacking themes that support the new features in
> 3.0.  If you use the tag filter and check "custom-menu" 0 results (TwentyTen
> needs this tag added), check "custom-background" 1 result, editor-style (not
> 3.0 specific) 3 results.
>
> If you check all 3 new features: custom-header, custom-background,
> custom-menu 0 results.
>
> Is it acceptable and fair to authors who have had themes in
> the queue longer to skip ahead and review themes just because they support
> the 3.0 features?
>
> I don't want to discriminate but I see these themes being requested in the
> forums and right now we only have TwentyTen.
>
>
> [image: Chris Olbekson]
>
> [image: WordPress Support Profile]
> <http://wordpress.org/support/profile/3629249>
>
> <http://wordpress.org/support/profile/3629249>
>
> [image: C3MDigital.com] <http://c3mdigital.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/private/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100701/3bdc3fd5/attachment-0001.htm>