[theme-reviewers] Some qs about Black Queen 1.0 theme

[Ford Mon]

Hello,
#3) Lookup the function wp_enqueue_style() and use it to load your .css
files, the only one that should have a resemblence in the header is the
designated first style.css that should be above all the rest.   If there is
a reason for the order then I suggest combining the css files into one.   If
they are loaded for a reason and can be enabled disabled wp_enqueue_style is
definately needed.

For what use wp_enqueue_style()? in my theme and If it's really needed for
what css file I should use it?


#1) this means that the css borders padding and margins are too encompassing
to allow 4 columns, adjust as necessary so that 4 columns can display in the
content area.

I am not able to adjust margins to allow 4 columns.. 3 columns is the best
choice for my theme. For example this theme
http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/fudo has been accepted several weeks ago
and it has the same problem with 4 columns. It has even the same issure with
the .css ( see 3)



On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net
> wrote:

>  #2) after the_content() is used, anything that is inside of the post that
> has been floated has the possibilty of everything after it floating, so
> after the_content() is used, floats must be cleared.  T his is recognizably
> very easily on a post that has multiple pages.   Toss an image in the post
> and float it left, if the pages [1][2][3] appears to the right of it, its
> not clearing the floats as needed after the_content() displays.
>
> <div class="entry">
>     <?php the_content(); ?>
>     <div class="clear"></div>>
> </div>
>  <?php wp_link_pages(); ?>
>
>
> #1) this means that the css borders padding and margins are too
> encompassing to allow 4 columns, adjust as necessary so that 4 columns can
> display in the content area.
>
> #3) Lookup the function wp_enqueue_style() and use it to load your .css
> files, the only one that should have a resemblence in the header is the
> designated first style.css that should be above all the rest.   If there is
> a reason for the order then I suggest combining the css files into one.   If
> they are loaded for a reason and can be enabled disabled wp_enqueue_style is
> definately needed.
>
> Other notes are that this theme seems to resemble several others on the
> repository, we do not allow child themes at this time and the only way that
> multiple themes of the same variety are allowed coding wise is if they all
> have distinct functions unique to themself that the others do not do.,  not
> just design.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Ford Mon <fordmon at gmail.com>
> *To:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> *Sent:* Monday, December 20, 2010 3:09 PM
> *Subject:* [theme-reviewers] Some qs about Black Queen 1.0 theme
>
> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/2122
>
>
> Hello All,
>
>  I have created a theme
> http://www.themesfromrobin.com/2010/11/black-queen-wp-theme/
> and uploaded into trac.wordpress.org.  It was tested recently and rejected
> until I fix the following:
>
> 1) // Galleries with more than three columns aren't shown correctly.
> Test [gallery columns="4"] and it breaks the gallery.» //
>
> I looked into the stadard wordpress theme and when tested it there was the
> same error.
> http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/6216/screenshot117.png
> It can't look well with 4 colums, the best look is 3 columns. Could you
> explain what to do in this case?
>
> 2. // Floated elements aren't cleared in the post content. This only seems
> to be the case when usingwp_link_pages().»//
>
> I can not decipher this statement. Could you help
>
> 3. //«Additional stylesheets should be appropriately loaded
> using wp_enqueue_style()»//
>
> What does it mean?
>
> The main style in my theme is the same as it is in the standard wp theme (
> the perfect sample). An additional style is also added according to the
> codex. At least it is the same as it's in this accepted theme
> http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/fudo
>
> Many thanks in advance
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20101220/e3d13d33/attachment.htm>