[theme-reviewers] Codex: Theme Review page

[Chip Bennett]

Looks great!

My only comment regards the by-file listing for functions, tags, and hooks:
I had it laid out that way to facilitate stepping through the Theme files
during the review: functions.php, header.php, index.php, comments.php,
sidebar.php, footer.php.

If we could organize the list such that it sorts by
required/recommended/optional, and still facilitates a single-pass Theme
step-through, that would be awesome. I'll take a look (later).

The next thing on my to-do list was to add Codex links, so I'll try to clean
that up, also, when I get the chance.

Chip

On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net
> wrote:

>  Cais,
>
> Revamped the Theme Review codex per our discussion we had earliar.   * Need
> to verify that I didn't miss any thing.
>
> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#WordPress_Hooks_and_Template_Tags
>
> Changed:  Version information shows what features were released with
> required implementation date.
>
> Changed: Hooks and Template tags to denote a bulk of what is must, should
> and other optionals instead of separating them by individual files so it
> would be in a checklist type appearing.
>
> * Still needs to be updated to fix all the <tt>'s adjusting them where
> appropriate and implement proper codex links.  I'm not the best with
> wikicode.
>
> - Phil
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100822/b5e1d420/attachment.htm>