[theme-reviewers] Theme Review Codex Page

Chip Bennett chip at chipbennett.net
Sat Aug 21 01:25:47 UTC 2010

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:

> "This all got hashed out right when the list and group started getting off
> the ground."
> I have to state that was not in any way shape or form a unanimous decision!
> It was a brief thread that was picked up and ran with ... with minimal
> "group" inputs that I recall.
> Cais.

I agree completely - and like I said, I was originally of the opposing
school of thought.

But, while it is good to revisit these things, it would be best if we could
come up with some guiding principles to use moving forward. It is unfair to
Theme developers to change these kinds of decisions frequently and
arbitrarily. (Some Themes have already been denied, in part, due to lack of
support for features that we're now discussing making optional.)

So: just a caveat: we need to tread lightly, and future-proof our
decision-making process.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100820/832b6211/attachment.htm>

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list