[theme-reviewers] Open Ticket Queue

[Edward Caissie]

I like the idea of some sort of follow-up resolution. We will have to get
Joseph involved with the discussions ...

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 15, 2010, at 8:12 AM, "Philip M. Hofer \(Frumph\)" <philip at frumph.net>
wrote:

Often enough that you've seen them ;)

Maybe a 'second opinion' flag on the tickets would be nice, but yeah if you
read the comments though that's cool too

- Phil

As for the link ones, i'd rather just tag the ownership as Chip and move on
to the next one. ;/



----- Original Message -----
*From:* Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>
*To:* Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net>
*Cc:* Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> ; <
theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
*Sent:* Sunday, August 15, 2010 5:09 AM
*Subject:* Re: Open Ticket Queue

I generally read through all the comments before updating Extend/Themes, for
the time being just add as an additional comment after the review notes and
resolve as "not accepted". How often do these situations come up? I have
seem a few comments in your reviews like this but have not been keeping
track.


Cais

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 15, 2010, at 3:47 AM, "Philip M. Hofer \(Frumph\)" <philip at frumph.net>
wrote:

  Chip & Cais, with themes that have the requirement of the URL wrong, or
some issue as such that needs a follow-up, I could use a admin-followup flag
or something denoting that one of the admin's needs to make a judgement call
on.

Ref:  reference theme <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/766>
http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/766  where they may have changed the
url, slightly but I have no idea if it would still be acceptable or not, ya
know, situations like this.

- Phil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100815/d15baefd/attachment.htm>