[wp-hackers] [GSOC2010]WPmove [wpurl] tag replace
admin at oxymaniac.com
Thu Apr 8 13:22:20 UTC 2010
yes the data of serialized content will have [wpurl] like tag too.as main
aim was to have a single place where we edit the domain making the content
virtually independent of the domain name(specially great for media, linking
and move. :)
I agree that there will be a slight delay in rendering data at any level.
and this idea isnt for a plugin it is for the whole change of the way wp
stores data and the function that calls the url.
with wp-cache plugins, this will not be a problem at all :)
prompt to amke the string replace for the dynamic [wpurl] or keep the static
link. in that case, its the final choice of the user.
> From: Brian McKenna <puffnfresh at gmail.com>
> To: wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 15:08:03 +1000
> Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] [GSOC2010]WPmove [wpurl] tag replace
> That's an interesting idea. Just some quick questions.
> The main problem so far with migrating is replacing the strings in
> serialised data (in options, for example) - does that mean that
> [wpurl] will be put in everything and then replaced when anything gets
> rendered (not just post content)?
> If so, wouldn't having a string replace over the (possibly buffered)
> output cause some extra delay in page rendering?
> Also, what happens if a user innocently copies and pastes a URL from
> their website into the edit screens? Does it automatically get
> replaced with [wpurl]?
> Brian McKenna
> On 8 April 2010 14:32, Piyush Mishra <admin at oxymaniac.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have proposed WPmove as a plugin/core
> > wp version : http://piyushmishra.com/blog/ideas/wpmove.html
> > During my chats with various mentors I came across this issue that to
> > the need of such complex WPmove, we can switch to the basic concept of
> > making a universal tag say [wpurl] and place it whereever we need the url
> > wp. While using the url in posts, we can ask the user if he/she wants to
> > have the [wpurl] tag replace for url or keep the static url up. this will
> > help in reducing the issues and efforts for future versions of WP. ( this
> > Point is very vital and must be considered even if the proposal is
> > I thought that this needs some good discussion and thus put it up here.
> > please post your feedbacks
> > --
> > Regards
> > Piyush Mishra
> > ______________________________
> > wp-hackers mailing list
> > wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
More information about the wp-hackers