[wp-hackers] Rebuttal (re: Meta tables: Take 5)
scribu at gmail.com
Fri Jul 24 17:46:22 UTC 2009
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 8:44 PM, <mikeschinkel at newclarity.net> wrote:
> One thing to consider; in the "standard" approach would it make sense to
> have meta type stored in it's own table so that the type field in the meta
> table could be an INT and thus stored and indexed efficiently?
I don't think there would be that many types to justify an additional table,
at least not at first.
More information about the wp-hackers