[theme-reviewers] Why can't theme authors have a second version of a theme?

[Trent Lapinski]

I am fine with "Responsive Mobile".

I still think it's silly we can't use a standard naming practice in the technology industry using numbers in a supposedly open source community but if we can keep our branding somehow and end this debate and resolve this then so be it.

-Trent
CEO CyberChimps Inc. 
Sent from my iPad

> On Sep 27, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Trent Lapinski <trent at cyberchimps.com> wrote:
> 
>> Fine, if we resubmit is as “Responsive HD” or “Responsive MF” does that work?
> 
> 
> From the ticket:
> > Replaced responsive grid with mobile first grid.
> 
> How about a name that is more descriptive than "II" then? "Responsive Mobile", or "Responsive Grid" or something? 
> 
> My original objections were not to the use of the word Responsive, but to the version number being part of the name. "HD" doesn't seem to apply, and while I get what "MF" means now, it's a bit unusual for a name.
> 
> -Otto
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140927/3ec0b1e7/attachment.html>